Vikki Knafo, the single mother determined to foment a “social revolution” in Israel, is obviously a can-do person.
In a normal social and economic environment her energy and determination would probably have enabled her to build a successful career despite being a divorcee raising three children.
But the Israeli welfare state and the leftist ideology that inspires it have made Vikki a victim.
Filed under:
welfare
Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu juxtaposed with single mother crusader Vikki Knaffo (photo montage by Y-Net)
The heavily taxed, stagnant economy created by our welfare system militates against job creation. Chronic unemployment deprives Knafo and people like her of job opportunities that would constructively engage their energies and talents. Worse, even when some of them do find work, their salaries are so heavily taxed – and prices of consumer goods are so highly inflated by Israeli monopolies – that it is difficult for them to make ends meet.
Being on welfare is therefore a far more lucrative alternative. The various welfare payments and benefits far exceed the low salaries unskilled workers receive. Which is why in the last decade the number of those who receive supplemental income and benefits from the government has skyrocketed. It is also why these beneficiaries, such as single mothers, are fighting Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s attempt to get them off the welfare rolls and go to work. It simply does not pay.
Moreover, a welfare mentality promoted by powerful social lobbies and NGOs has accustomed most Israelis to consider welfare and other government handouts a birthright. They see government giving the rich and the powerful benefits worth billions, and say “Why not us?” It does not even occur to them that remaining idle while benefiting from income earned by hardworking taxpayers may be a moral problem.
The most well funded ($20 million a year) social advocacy group is the New Israel Fund. When it is not doing battle against globalization and economic development it devotes large chunks of its resources to organizing beneficiary groups that are taught “to realize their rights” for welfare rather than work.
So small wonder that even fine people from the “weakened groups” in the so-called development towns, people with great potential like Vikki Knafo, are being reduced to the status of schnorrer by all these social welfare organizations promoting leftist causes.
These organizations do nothing to redress the real problems facing low-income people: lack of work, highly taxed income and inflated costs. Instead, they promote a curious inversion of the Zionist dream that hoped to make a new and productive people out of a putative nation of schnorrers.
TO REALIZE what perverse conditions Israel’s radical welfare state created, try to imagine the energetic Knafo in suburban America. Even in small towns that recall Mitzpe Ramon she would probably be very successful, possessing a nice home and two cars. Only in the economically barren Israeli “periphery” (a joke really, since it is about 100 miles from Tel Aviv) despoiled by years of government “development” and welfarism are people of her quality doomed to remain clients of the welfare state with all that implies in terms of dependency on a politicized bureaucracy and the demoralization of a life without work.
What is astounding is that even if Knafo and her friends have been victims of a retrograde economic system that destroys work opportunities, that punishes those who work and rewards those who do not, powerful political forces and organizations ostensibly devoted to social betterment are doing all they can to keep her dependent on the system by energetically promoting the notion that only through dependency on welfare can she survive, even fulfill herself.
As the web site of a New Israel Fund subsidiary organization, Shatil, explains, it promotes “social justice” (you know what that means), human and citizens’ rights etc. etc., and helps create lobbies for welfare recipients by, inter alia, providing help in getting grants for such activities as “The Rich Get Rich and The Poor Fill In Grant Requests,” the statement explains.
According to its activists, Shatil has also been active in Mitzpe Ramon in galvanizing the anger of “the weakened strata” against government economic policy by “building power from the bottom up.” This includes teaching the local population about political and ideological principles, so they can “recognize the connection between capital and government and the fact that the employment of foreign workers is encouraged by the government because it reduces wages and the power of organized labor.”
KNAFO’S PROTEST resulted from this kind of agitation by Shatil. Even before she set out on her mission Shatil encouraged her to go. Shatil activists even gave the mission its catchy label “A March to the End of the Road” (meaning the end of the government’s road). Shatil later facilitated Knafo’s media exposure, mapped her strategy (warned her not to become politically identified and to claim that she represents a wider group than she does) and guided her through her negotiations with the Ministry of Finance.
It was all done not just to help Knafo, but, in the words of Shlomit Asheri, the Shatil representative attached to Knafo (who defines her task as “strictly political”), “to hopefully see a social revolution.”
Knafo’s is the most publicized effort by groups organized and supported by Shatil to push a radical leftist agenda among new immigrants, residents of development towns and Arabs. It is curious that this effort is financed by such capitalist entities as Faizer Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the Bronfman philanthropies, Lester Crown of General Dynamics and many more (reportedly also including the European Union and The British Lottery).
A visit to the tents the Kibbutz movement has provided for the single mothers, and long conversations with some of them, revealed the following picture:
Most of the time there are no more than three to six authentic welfare recipients among the crowd of 30 to 40 persons milling in front of the Ministry of Finance. All the rest are enablers representing Shatil, the Kibbutz movement, Na’amat, the Labor women’s organization, a few Shas activists and the odd assortment of characters with personal missions or peeves that is always attracted by TV cameras.
Then there are the politicians, of course – on this particular occasion Ran Cohen and Haim Oron of Meretz, who lectured the women at length on how shifty Netanyahu is “screwing” them and how his whole lousy economic program must be undermined.
The women seemed rather baffled by all this attention. They could not even make sense of what sort of “social revolution” they were supposed to spearhead. But given enough time, they will learn.
The social enablers, politicians and a media determined to see a new anti-reform, anti-Netanyahu social movement (which Chanel 1 economic analyst Oded Shahar is already anticipating) will get their mass “spontaneous” protest movement even if in reality it comprises only a few dozen women – by a very generous count – organized and prodded by bodies with a political ax to grind.
There are many poor people in Israel, and even those who are not poor can hardly make ends meet on measly salaries, high taxes and inflated costs. But the answer to their plight does not lie in reinstating the socialist welfare state responsible for their predicament in the first place.
But this is precisely what most social advocacy groups want to happen. And they cynically exploit Knafo’s plight and passion to advance their ideological and political ambitions.
Log in or Register
The passion of Vikki Knafo
The Jerusalem Post
17 Jul ’03
Vikki Knafo, the single mother determined to foment a “social revolution” in Israel, is obviously a can-do person.
In a normal social and economic environment her energy and determination would probably have enabled her to build a successful career despite being a divorcee raising three children.
But the Israeli welfare state and the leftist ideology that inspires it have made Vikki a victim.
Filed under:
welfare
Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu juxtaposed with single mother crusader Vikki Knaffo (photo montage by Y-Net)
The heavily taxed, stagnant economy created by our welfare system militates against job creation. Chronic unemployment deprives Knafo and people like her of job opportunities that would constructively engage their energies and talents. Worse, even when some of them do find work, their salaries are so heavily taxed – and prices of consumer goods are so highly inflated by Israeli monopolies – that it is difficult for them to make ends meet.
Being on welfare is therefore a far more lucrative alternative. The various welfare payments and benefits far exceed the low salaries unskilled workers receive. Which is why in the last decade the number of those who receive supplemental income and benefits from the government has skyrocketed. It is also why these beneficiaries, such as single mothers, are fighting Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s attempt to get them off the welfare rolls and go to work. It simply does not pay.
Moreover, a welfare mentality promoted by powerful social lobbies and NGOs has accustomed most Israelis to consider welfare and other government handouts a birthright. They see government giving the rich and the powerful benefits worth billions, and say “Why not us?” It does not even occur to them that remaining idle while benefiting from income earned by hardworking taxpayers may be a moral problem.
The most well funded ($20 million a year) social advocacy group is the New Israel Fund. When it is not doing battle against globalization and economic development it devotes large chunks of its resources to organizing beneficiary groups that are taught “to realize their rights” for welfare rather than work.
So small wonder that even fine people from the “weakened groups” in the so-called development towns, people with great potential like Vikki Knafo, are being reduced to the status of schnorrer by all these social welfare organizations promoting leftist causes.
These organizations do nothing to redress the real problems facing low-income people: lack of work, highly taxed income and inflated costs. Instead, they promote a curious inversion of the Zionist dream that hoped to make a new and productive people out of a putative nation of schnorrers.
TO REALIZE what perverse conditions Israel’s radical welfare state created, try to imagine the energetic Knafo in suburban America. Even in small towns that recall Mitzpe Ramon she would probably be very successful, possessing a nice home and two cars. Only in the economically barren Israeli “periphery” (a joke really, since it is about 100 miles from Tel Aviv) despoiled by years of government “development” and welfarism are people of her quality doomed to remain clients of the welfare state with all that implies in terms of dependency on a politicized bureaucracy and the demoralization of a life without work.
What is astounding is that even if Knafo and her friends have been victims of a retrograde economic system that destroys work opportunities, that punishes those who work and rewards those who do not, powerful political forces and organizations ostensibly devoted to social betterment are doing all they can to keep her dependent on the system by energetically promoting the notion that only through dependency on welfare can she survive, even fulfill herself.
As the web site of a New Israel Fund subsidiary organization, Shatil, explains, it promotes “social justice” (you know what that means), human and citizens’ rights etc. etc., and helps create lobbies for welfare recipients by, inter alia, providing help in getting grants for such activities as “The Rich Get Rich and The Poor Fill In Grant Requests,” the statement explains.
According to its activists, Shatil has also been active in Mitzpe Ramon in galvanizing the anger of “the weakened strata” against government economic policy by “building power from the bottom up.” This includes teaching the local population about political and ideological principles, so they can “recognize the connection between capital and government and the fact that the employment of foreign workers is encouraged by the government because it reduces wages and the power of organized labor.”
KNAFO’S PROTEST resulted from this kind of agitation by Shatil. Even before she set out on her mission Shatil encouraged her to go. Shatil activists even gave the mission its catchy label “A March to the End of the Road” (meaning the end of the government’s road). Shatil later facilitated Knafo’s media exposure, mapped her strategy (warned her not to become politically identified and to claim that she represents a wider group than she does) and guided her through her negotiations with the Ministry of Finance.
It was all done not just to help Knafo, but, in the words of Shlomit Asheri, the Shatil representative attached to Knafo (who defines her task as “strictly political”), “to hopefully see a social revolution.”
Knafo’s is the most publicized effort by groups organized and supported by Shatil to push a radical leftist agenda among new immigrants, residents of development towns and Arabs. It is curious that this effort is financed by such capitalist entities as Faizer Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the Bronfman philanthropies, Lester Crown of General Dynamics and many more (reportedly also including the European Union and The British Lottery).
A visit to the tents the Kibbutz movement has provided for the single mothers, and long conversations with some of them, revealed the following picture:
Most of the time there are no more than three to six authentic welfare recipients among the crowd of 30 to 40 persons milling in front of the Ministry of Finance. All the rest are enablers representing Shatil, the Kibbutz movement, Na’amat, the Labor women’s organization, a few Shas activists and the odd assortment of characters with personal missions or peeves that is always attracted by TV cameras.
Then there are the politicians, of course – on this particular occasion Ran Cohen and Haim Oron of Meretz, who lectured the women at length on how shifty Netanyahu is “screwing” them and how his whole lousy economic program must be undermined.
The women seemed rather baffled by all this attention. They could not even make sense of what sort of “social revolution” they were supposed to spearhead. But given enough time, they will learn.
The social enablers, politicians and a media determined to see a new anti-reform, anti-Netanyahu social movement (which Chanel 1 economic analyst Oded Shahar is already anticipating) will get their mass “spontaneous” protest movement even if in reality it comprises only a few dozen women – by a very generous count – organized and prodded by bodies with a political ax to grind.
There are many poor people in Israel, and even those who are not poor can hardly make ends meet on measly salaries, high taxes and inflated costs. But the answer to their plight does not lie in reinstating the socialist welfare state responsible for their predicament in the first place.
But this is precisely what most social advocacy groups want to happen. And they cynically exploit Knafo’s plight and passion to advance their ideological and political ambitions.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.