After careful examination of the record, several media analysts have concluded that many among the foreign media, especially in CNN and the BBC, are actively engaged in a propaganda war designed to delegitimize Israel.
This is a harsh conclusion, but it is obvious that these media mandarins are promoting the Arab propaganda line that Israel is a colonialist power with few legitimate rights to the land, and that it willfully kills innocent Arabs, even children.
Filed under:
media
Jane Arraf of CNN, "Often the only Western journalist reporting from Iraq..."
Many hundreds of Arabs, while systematically attacking a few Israeli soldiers with stones, blocks, firebombs, automatic weapons, and dynamite, are systematically called “demonstrators” (as if they were manning a peaceful picket line).
Israel’s defensive response is always depicted as initiating aggression. To prove Israeli brutality, CNN reported almost one hundred Arab dead, including “nearly two dozen of them children,” on October 13. But an October 27 Arab list, known for exaggerating, claimed only eight children dead. Moreover, considering there were over 3000 violent mass attacks on Israelis, half involving firearms, the number of Arab casualties is comparatively low, while the extraordinarily high ratio of estimated wounded to killed (30 to 1 it is usually 4 to 1) proves that Israelis were extremely careful not to kill. CNN and the BBC habitually refer to “conquered Palestinian land,” though no land could have been conquered from a Palestinian entity that never existed. They ignore the fact that these territories were taken from Jordan after it illegally annexed them and launched several unprovoked wars against Israel.
They do not mention that Israel took the unprecedented (some say foolish) step of ceding the territories where over 90% of the Palestinian Arabs live, to Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat. Nor do they explain that Arafat, until recently head of a terrorist organization, established a corrupt oppressive regime, violating human rights by kidnapping, arbitrary arrest, torture and extortion, while deflecting the resulting Palestinian anger against Israel.
A false picture is painted because the media’s motives would be exposed if people realized what a horrible dictatorship they support (though anyone remembering Western media’s wide support for Stalinism ought not to be surprised). We are not told that Palestinian children “demonstrate” because they are subjected to the Palestinian Authority’s racist indoctrination program that depicts Jews as murderers and rapists, bloodsuckers, dogs, monkeys and pigs, and enemies of Islam who massacre the faithful; nor of its incitement to a holy Jihad and to the murder of Jews and Christians.
The BBC alleges that Israeli aggressors gratuitously rained “wave after wave of missiles” on civilians. This, on the day that two Israelis were lynched, and Israel fired two missiles at an empty Palestinian police station.
CNN and the BBC do not air footage showing children being used as human shields by heavily armed Palestinian soldiers, masked as “police” or “civilians” (“protesters” in their doublespeak), who are attacking Israelis with the intent to kill. They never mention that, should Israeli soldiers hold their fire, they would be overrun and brutally butchered, as the Ramallah lynching so graphically demonstrated.
As third world “underdogs,” the Arabs can do no wrong, despite the Palestinians’ long bloody record and the several wars mounted in an effort to annihilate Israel. Arafat’s well orchestrated assaults constitute a war of attrition, and yet are always described as “protests” or “clashes” that “erupt” spontaneously as a result of putative Israeli “provocations,” such as the visit by Likud leader Ariel Sharon to “the Jerusalem site known [sic] as the Temple Mount…” (Also described as “a Jerusalem shrine [sic] revered by Moslems [first, of course] and Jews” or “a Jerusalem holy site… which Moslems [first, again] call [sic] the Noble Sanctuary and Jews the Temple Mount”.)
Anything but the simple truth, that it is the Palestinians who always attack; that “the holy site” is not only “called”, but actually is the ancient Jewish Temple Mount, antedating Jesus’s birth; or that a Moslem imperial conqueror graced it with two (beautiful) Moslem shrines to assert Moslem domination.
Nor are we told that Israel liberally allowed Moslems to control these shrines, while Arabs violently deny any Jewish right, even the right of prayer, on Judaism’s most sacred site. We cannot here fully describe the Orwellian doublespeak, selective reporting and tendentious omissions habitually used to falsely condemn Israel, while whitewashing a murderous jingoistic Arab nationalism. The notorious laziness and ignorance of many correspondents (eternalized in Evelyn Waugh’s Scoop) cannot excuse such extreme partiality.
It must be ideology that motivates such a motley crew as the BBC’s Paul Adams and Lyse Doucet, or CNN’s Mike Hanna and Jerrold Kessel to discard their professional integrity and mount a propaganda campaign against Israel, repeating without checking or questioning the Goebbels-like lies of Hanan Ashrawi and Saeb Erekat. They can see what their false reporting has wrought an atavistic wave of antisemitism, including synagogue torching in Europe, promoted by their depiction of Jews as child killers.
What is equally disturbing, however, is that the Israeli public, and Jews worldwide, tolerate such bloody abuse without a strong reaction.
Log in or Register
The media’s propaganda war
The Jerusalem Post
9 Nov ’01
After careful examination of the record, several media analysts have concluded that many among the foreign media, especially in CNN and the BBC, are actively engaged in a propaganda war designed to delegitimize Israel.
This is a harsh conclusion, but it is obvious that these media mandarins are promoting the Arab propaganda line that Israel is a colonialist power with few legitimate rights to the land, and that it willfully kills innocent Arabs, even children.
Filed under:
media
Jane Arraf of CNN, "Often the only Western journalist reporting from Iraq..."
Many hundreds of Arabs, while systematically attacking a few Israeli soldiers with stones, blocks, firebombs, automatic weapons, and dynamite, are systematically called “demonstrators” (as if they were manning a peaceful picket line).
Israel’s defensive response is always depicted as initiating aggression. To prove Israeli brutality, CNN reported almost one hundred Arab dead, including “nearly two dozen of them children,” on October 13. But an October 27 Arab list, known for exaggerating, claimed only eight children dead. Moreover, considering there were over 3000 violent mass attacks on Israelis, half involving firearms, the number of Arab casualties is comparatively low, while the extraordinarily high ratio of estimated wounded to killed (30 to 1 it is usually 4 to 1) proves that Israelis were extremely careful not to kill. CNN and the BBC habitually refer to “conquered Palestinian land,” though no land could have been conquered from a Palestinian entity that never existed. They ignore the fact that these territories were taken from Jordan after it illegally annexed them and launched several unprovoked wars against Israel.
They do not mention that Israel took the unprecedented (some say foolish) step of ceding the territories where over 90% of the Palestinian Arabs live, to Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat. Nor do they explain that Arafat, until recently head of a terrorist organization, established a corrupt oppressive regime, violating human rights by kidnapping, arbitrary arrest, torture and extortion, while deflecting the resulting Palestinian anger against Israel.
A false picture is painted because the media’s motives would be exposed if people realized what a horrible dictatorship they support (though anyone remembering Western media’s wide support for Stalinism ought not to be surprised). We are not told that Palestinian children “demonstrate” because they are subjected to the Palestinian Authority’s racist indoctrination program that depicts Jews as murderers and rapists, bloodsuckers, dogs, monkeys and pigs, and enemies of Islam who massacre the faithful; nor of its incitement to a holy Jihad and to the murder of Jews and Christians.
The BBC alleges that Israeli aggressors gratuitously rained “wave after wave of missiles” on civilians. This, on the day that two Israelis were lynched, and Israel fired two missiles at an empty Palestinian police station.
CNN and the BBC do not air footage showing children being used as human shields by heavily armed Palestinian soldiers, masked as “police” or “civilians” (“protesters” in their doublespeak), who are attacking Israelis with the intent to kill. They never mention that, should Israeli soldiers hold their fire, they would be overrun and brutally butchered, as the Ramallah lynching so graphically demonstrated.
As third world “underdogs,” the Arabs can do no wrong, despite the Palestinians’ long bloody record and the several wars mounted in an effort to annihilate Israel. Arafat’s well orchestrated assaults constitute a war of attrition, and yet are always described as “protests” or “clashes” that “erupt” spontaneously as a result of putative Israeli “provocations,” such as the visit by Likud leader Ariel Sharon to “the Jerusalem site known [sic] as the Temple Mount…” (Also described as “a Jerusalem shrine [sic] revered by Moslems [first, of course] and Jews” or “a Jerusalem holy site… which Moslems [first, again] call [sic] the Noble Sanctuary and Jews the Temple Mount”.)
Anything but the simple truth, that it is the Palestinians who always attack; that “the holy site” is not only “called”, but actually is the ancient Jewish Temple Mount, antedating Jesus’s birth; or that a Moslem imperial conqueror graced it with two (beautiful) Moslem shrines to assert Moslem domination.
Nor are we told that Israel liberally allowed Moslems to control these shrines, while Arabs violently deny any Jewish right, even the right of prayer, on Judaism’s most sacred site. We cannot here fully describe the Orwellian doublespeak, selective reporting and tendentious omissions habitually used to falsely condemn Israel, while whitewashing a murderous jingoistic Arab nationalism. The notorious laziness and ignorance of many correspondents (eternalized in Evelyn Waugh’s Scoop) cannot excuse such extreme partiality.
It must be ideology that motivates such a motley crew as the BBC’s Paul Adams and Lyse Doucet, or CNN’s Mike Hanna and Jerrold Kessel to discard their professional integrity and mount a propaganda campaign against Israel, repeating without checking or questioning the Goebbels-like lies of Hanan Ashrawi and Saeb Erekat. They can see what their false reporting has wrought an atavistic wave of antisemitism, including synagogue torching in Europe, promoted by their depiction of Jews as child killers.
What is equally disturbing, however, is that the Israeli public, and Jews worldwide, tolerate such bloody abuse without a strong reaction.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.