Poverty persists in Israel because the poor are manipulated
The Jerusalem Post 31 Jul ’03
It is now certain.
The heart-rending march of Vikki Knafo and the single mothers’ protest were not spontaneous but an effort organized and manipulated by several bodies with a political ax to grind.
One of the chief organizers of the protest, Vered Bracha Steinberg, helped secure for Knafo tents and food from Meretz and from the Histadrut, and transportation from the Modi’in municipality.
According to her these bodies, and above all Shatil, the crypto-Marxist executive arm of The New Israel Fund, recognized the political potential of Knafo’s protest, and proceeded to cynically exploit it.
By its own admission, Shatil used Knafo to foment a ‘social revolution’ designed at least to undermine Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s economic reforms and perhaps even bring down Sharon’s government.
By relentlessly showering the baffled Knafo with advice and media exposure, Shatil has coopted her to such an extent that she no longer dares to speak to anyone without Shatil being present.
According to Knafo’s associates, every move she makes – meet the finance minister, and on what terms- are dictated by Shatil’s political representatives. They also determine what group is welcome to join the protest and what group to exclude, thus sowing bickering, even violence among the protesting mothers.
Observers witnessed Shatil insisting that only those who accept Knafo’s (namely Shatil’s) authority are entitled to ‘represent’ the protest, though Knafo was never elected by anyone to represent single mothers, nor has anyone given Shatil a mandate to dictate the terms of their protest.
SHATIL HAS a long record of organizing hundreds of ‘social action’ front organizations with distinctly leftist, radically anti-capitalist, post-Zionist and pro-Palestinian agendas. Groups it has sponsored have instigated violent demonstrations against globalization at business conferences (at a time when Israel was desperate for investments; see ‘Hating The Rich’ (December 6, 2001).
Shatil has organized student groups, sometimes consisting of less than a dozen activists, who have been spreading vile propaganda against ‘rich businessmen,’ painting them all as evil exploiters. As Caroline Glick documented (in ‘The Road to Irredentism,’ August 9, 2002), as far back as 1998 The New Israel Fund prepared a conference at the Smithsonian Institute that was so overloaded with far-Left, anti-Israel speakers that the Smithsonian cancelled it.
Shatil has sponsored many ostensible ‘human rights’ organizations that specialize in defaming Israel, including Adala, an Arab group that vilifies Israel in every UN body as undemocratic and even racist because it is Zionist; and Kav La’oved, which at the notorious Durban Conference billed Israel as racist and exploitative, claiming that the intifada was motivated by a revolt against Israel’s exploitation of cheap Arab labor, and that therefore Israel was importing hundreds of thousands of blacks to exploit as cheap labor, helping it to depress wages for Israeli workers.
Dozens of Shatil front organizations are busy indoctrinating two important population segments, new immigrants and the low-paid inhabitants of development towns. As some of its activists acknowledge, they are trying to shift the political balance to the Left. It is no accident, therefore, that once Knafo gained media attention a group of Beduin (among whom Shatil agitators have been active for some time, teaching them about their ‘Palestinian affiliations’) joined the scene to protest Israeli government land policies. This despite the fact that many of the single mothers resented their presence.
Shatil activists explain that it has long been their goal to create ‘a coalition of the oppressed’ that will merge the interests of the development town poor – known for their traditionally nationalist beliefs and strong suspicion of Arab jingoist proclivities – with the Arab poor. This, they explain, will advance their twin goals: promoting a more extensive and ‘equitable’ welfare state and lowering resistance among the lower-paid strata to Arab nationalist aspirations. Eventually such a coalition could help transform Israel from a parochial Jewish state, which progressive souls deem undemocratic and racist, to a ‘state of all its citizens.’
It matters not to the Shatil activists that in pursuing their political agenda they are actually harming the single mothers. Anyone familiar with economics understands that raising government handouts, as they recommend, when the government is already sustaining a threatening deficit, is only going to inflame inflation and lower the purchasing power of those handouts.
If, instead, the social lobby took on Israeli monopolies and the banks that levy a hidden tax of 30%-50% percent on all consumer items (TV’s Channel 1 this week documented that prices of food staples in Israel are between four to eight times higher than in other countries) and forced them to bring prices down to competitive levels, they could increase the purchasing power of the lower strata by at least 30%, which would result in a huge improvement in their standard of living. This without increasing inflation, from which the poor suffer most.
That social lobby organizations have not a word to say about the outrageous exploitation of the poor by Israeli monopolies and by the rapacious banks shows that their real agenda is not helping the poor but exploiting them for political purposes.
THE NEW ISRAEL Fund is not alone in this, of course. As mentioned, the Histadrut has tried to foment trouble among the single mothers, as have Meretz and Shas. The Histadrut’s Danny Ben Shetreet had a group of agitators and strongmen planted among the women, ostensibly to protect them but actually to remove any dissenting voices.
These henchman, and former Panther Charlie Biton, were seen on TV harassing a group of single mothers who came to express their opposition to handouts and to encourage the protesting mothers to find work. Their signs were torn and they were pushed around and threatened until they had to leave.
Meretz’s Ran Cohen and Haim Oron were seen calling for the protesting women to resist the whole economic reform plan and topple the evil government that proposed it; they were followed by Shlomo Benizri and Eli Yishai of Shas, who had no qualms inciting against the cuts they had earlier voted for. They too urged the women to topple the government.
Even the Jewish Agency – that moribund body of bureaucrats drawing inflated salaries – jumped on the band wagon. It will establish a body to help the mothers ‘realize their rights’ for welfare. In this it continues its venerable tradition of perverting the Zionist dream of establishing a self-sustaining population capable of supporting itself, replacing it with degenerative dependency on welfare bureaucracies and political handouts.
Finally, a word about the media. There was almost no reporting of the real events taking place around the media-fomented Vikki Knafo cult. There was not a word about the mothers being exploited politically, to the detriment of their real needs. Instead the media became the cheerleader for the false claims of politically motivated social groups that manipulate and exploit the poor, and give not a damn about their real suffering.
Log in or Register
Poverty persists in Israel because the poor are manipulated
The Jerusalem Post
31 Jul ’03
It is now certain.
The heart-rending march of Vikki Knafo and the single mothers’ protest were not spontaneous but an effort organized and manipulated by several bodies with a political ax to grind.
One of the chief organizers of the protest, Vered Bracha Steinberg, helped secure for Knafo tents and food from Meretz and from the Histadrut, and transportation from the Modi’in municipality.
According to her these bodies, and above all Shatil, the crypto-Marxist executive arm of The New Israel Fund, recognized the political potential of Knafo’s protest, and proceeded to cynically exploit it.
By its own admission, Shatil used Knafo to foment a ‘social revolution’ designed at least to undermine Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s economic reforms and perhaps even bring down Sharon’s government.
Filed under:
reform • welfare
Related links
New Israel Fund suggests Netanyahu’s economic plan will lead to totalitarianism
New Israel Fund claims it’s bringing direction to the single parent’s protest
Shatil, established 1982 by the New Israel Fund
By relentlessly showering the baffled Knafo with advice and media exposure, Shatil has coopted her to such an extent that she no longer dares to speak to anyone without Shatil being present.
According to Knafo’s associates, every move she makes – meet the finance minister, and on what terms- are dictated by Shatil’s political representatives. They also determine what group is welcome to join the protest and what group to exclude, thus sowing bickering, even violence among the protesting mothers.
Observers witnessed Shatil insisting that only those who accept Knafo’s (namely Shatil’s) authority are entitled to ‘represent’ the protest, though Knafo was never elected by anyone to represent single mothers, nor has anyone given Shatil a mandate to dictate the terms of their protest.
SHATIL HAS a long record of organizing hundreds of ‘social action’ front organizations with distinctly leftist, radically anti-capitalist, post-Zionist and pro-Palestinian agendas. Groups it has sponsored have instigated violent demonstrations against globalization at business conferences (at a time when Israel was desperate for investments; see ‘Hating The Rich’ (December 6, 2001).
Shatil has organized student groups, sometimes consisting of less than a dozen activists, who have been spreading vile propaganda against ‘rich businessmen,’ painting them all as evil exploiters. As Caroline Glick documented (in ‘The Road to Irredentism,’ August 9, 2002), as far back as 1998 The New Israel Fund prepared a conference at the Smithsonian Institute that was so overloaded with far-Left, anti-Israel speakers that the Smithsonian cancelled it.
Shatil has sponsored many ostensible ‘human rights’ organizations that specialize in defaming Israel, including Adala, an Arab group that vilifies Israel in every UN body as undemocratic and even racist because it is Zionist; and Kav La’oved, which at the notorious Durban Conference billed Israel as racist and exploitative, claiming that the intifada was motivated by a revolt against Israel’s exploitation of cheap Arab labor, and that therefore Israel was importing hundreds of thousands of blacks to exploit as cheap labor, helping it to depress wages for Israeli workers.
Dozens of Shatil front organizations are busy indoctrinating two important population segments, new immigrants and the low-paid inhabitants of development towns. As some of its activists acknowledge, they are trying to shift the political balance to the Left. It is no accident, therefore, that once Knafo gained media attention a group of Beduin (among whom Shatil agitators have been active for some time, teaching them about their ‘Palestinian affiliations’) joined the scene to protest Israeli government land policies. This despite the fact that many of the single mothers resented their presence.
Shatil activists explain that it has long been their goal to create ‘a coalition of the oppressed’ that will merge the interests of the development town poor – known for their traditionally nationalist beliefs and strong suspicion of Arab jingoist proclivities – with the Arab poor. This, they explain, will advance their twin goals: promoting a more extensive and ‘equitable’ welfare state and lowering resistance among the lower-paid strata to Arab nationalist aspirations. Eventually such a coalition could help transform Israel from a parochial Jewish state, which progressive souls deem undemocratic and racist, to a ‘state of all its citizens.’
It matters not to the Shatil activists that in pursuing their political agenda they are actually harming the single mothers. Anyone familiar with economics understands that raising government handouts, as they recommend, when the government is already sustaining a threatening deficit, is only going to inflame inflation and lower the purchasing power of those handouts.
If, instead, the social lobby took on Israeli monopolies and the banks that levy a hidden tax of 30%-50% percent on all consumer items (TV’s Channel 1 this week documented that prices of food staples in Israel are between four to eight times higher than in other countries) and forced them to bring prices down to competitive levels, they could increase the purchasing power of the lower strata by at least 30%, which would result in a huge improvement in their standard of living. This without increasing inflation, from which the poor suffer most.
That social lobby organizations have not a word to say about the outrageous exploitation of the poor by Israeli monopolies and by the rapacious banks shows that their real agenda is not helping the poor but exploiting them for political purposes.
THE NEW ISRAEL Fund is not alone in this, of course. As mentioned, the Histadrut has tried to foment trouble among the single mothers, as have Meretz and Shas. The Histadrut’s Danny Ben Shetreet had a group of agitators and strongmen planted among the women, ostensibly to protect them but actually to remove any dissenting voices.
These henchman, and former Panther Charlie Biton, were seen on TV harassing a group of single mothers who came to express their opposition to handouts and to encourage the protesting mothers to find work. Their signs were torn and they were pushed around and threatened until they had to leave.
Meretz’s Ran Cohen and Haim Oron were seen calling for the protesting women to resist the whole economic reform plan and topple the evil government that proposed it; they were followed by Shlomo Benizri and Eli Yishai of Shas, who had no qualms inciting against the cuts they had earlier voted for. They too urged the women to topple the government.
Even the Jewish Agency – that moribund body of bureaucrats drawing inflated salaries – jumped on the band wagon. It will establish a body to help the mothers ‘realize their rights’ for welfare. In this it continues its venerable tradition of perverting the Zionist dream of establishing a self-sustaining population capable of supporting itself, replacing it with degenerative dependency on welfare bureaucracies and political handouts.
Finally, a word about the media. There was almost no reporting of the real events taking place around the media-fomented Vikki Knafo cult. There was not a word about the mothers being exploited politically, to the detriment of their real needs. Instead the media became the cheerleader for the false claims of politically motivated social groups that manipulate and exploit the poor, and give not a damn about their real suffering.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.