A pack of media mavens, notably Ruth Sinai of Haaretz, savaged Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, claiming his adoption of the Irish model would result – and indeed has already resulted, they claim – in increased, rather than diminished, poverty.
Definitely so, if you subscribe to the statistical nonsense that misrepresents the number of the poor by making it dependent on relative rather than real values.
The Torah in Deuteronomy says: “For the poor shall never cease out of the land…” (15:11). Ever realistic, the Bible insists that poverty may be an unavoidable – if transitional – part of the human condition.
It may afflict anyone in a variety of circumstances: the young before they get integrated into the economy; mid-career adults who suddenly lose their station in life because of social or personal changes as happens to formerly thriving executives of failed industries, or to prosperous upper-middle-class women suddenly left by their husbands without sufficient resources or skills to cope. In a word, poverty is a difficult and complex problem that resists quick, universal, fix-it solutions.
The Bible therefore insists it is our duty to mitigate the harshness of poverty. “Thou shalt surely open thy hand unto thy poor and needy brother in thy land” (15:11). Do it directly, personally – not by relegating the poor to an anonymous welfare agency which will take care of it with moneys taken from others, at no direct cost to us.
But that was eons before political correctness mandated that we must pay lip service to the war on poverty but personally do little about it. In fact, our search for quick and easy solutions allows populist politicians and a new class of bureaucrats, academicians and their media allies to exploit poverty for ideological, political and remunerative purposes.
The war on poverty is such a bonanza for them that they are understandably reluctant to see anyone make a determined effort to reduce it significantly, especially if this implies any reduction in government welfare hand-outs.
It you think these are harsh charges consider the media outrage and the derision that met Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s promise that he intends to reduce poverty substantially by encouraging rapid economic growth, catapulting Israel into the ranks of the 10 wealthiest nations in the world.
Netanyahu had the temerity to suggest that after over 50 years in which Israel devoted as much as 30% of its bloated government budget (55% of its GNP) to welfare transfer payments – among the highest in Western-style economies – after billions spent on fighting poverty only to have made matters worse, with the number of the poor increasing and the income gap growing, the time has come to adopt more effective policies.
Netanyahu cited as a model the transformation of Ireland, not long ago one of Europe’s poorest countries, into one of its wealthiest, and noted that this astounding achievement was made possible by Ireland’s adoption of free market economy policies. Ireland sharply reduced welfare payments, dramatically cut taxes, enhanced competition and thereby created a pro-business environment.
For this transgression a pack of media mavens, notably Ruth Sinai of Haaretz savaged Netanyahu, claiming his adoption of the Irish model would result – as indeed it has resulted in Ireland, they claim – in increased, rather than diminished, poverty.
Ireland, Sinai warned, leads the European Union in the percentage of those at risk of poverty, namely those whose income falls below 60 percent of the median. Not only is the level of poverty in Ireland high, she claimed with glee, but its dimensions are spreading as the Irish economy grows and becomes richer.
Wonder of wonders: the economy grows and becomes richer, but the number of the poor increases. Should we not conclude that economic growth is bad, that it should be immediately stopped and Ireland returned to the state of equality in poverty? That was the case in communist countries which practiced, at least theoretically, the kind of leveling that the social lobby remembers with nostalgia.
Definitely yes, if you subscribe to the statistical nonsense that is called the “Genie Coefficient” from which the poverty line is extrapolated. It is a contrivance that misrepresents the number of the poor by making it dependent on relative rather than real values, so that if a Bill Gates should settle in Israel importing with him his enormous wealth, tens of thousands of Israelis would fall under the poverty line. That would happen without any change in our real situation, and only because the median income rose when Gates’s wealth lifted the total.
The Genie Coefficient is also grossly misleading because the survey which determines the median income includes only urban households’ income, not independent wage earners and farmers.
The survey also does not include non-cash income, or the income from participation in the black economy, which some economists appraise as 15 percent to 30% of the official GNP. And it makes the dubious claim that people will report their true income to government if they are assured secrecy. So the survey really provides a highly downward tilted estimation of income.
Only political inclination or a wish to be trendy can explain how a serious body such as the Central Bureau of Statistics can lend its name to such a questionable device – one that is misleading and causes so much harm, especially to the poor.
Instead of attacking Netanyahu, Ruth Sinai and her like had better learn more seriously what poverty really is, and how the economic growth that Netanyahu is trying to generate is the only true hope for the poor for extricating themselves from a debilitating culture of poverty.
Log in or Register
Is poverty here to stay?
The Jerusalem Post
5 May ’05
A pack of media mavens, notably Ruth Sinai of Haaretz, savaged Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, claiming his adoption of the Irish model would result – and indeed has already resulted, they claim – in increased, rather than diminished, poverty.
Definitely so, if you subscribe to the statistical nonsense that misrepresents the number of the poor by making it dependent on relative rather than real values.
Filed under:
public policy • welfare
Related links
‘The Celtic Tiger: A Winning Economy’ by Paul Tobin
The Torah in Deuteronomy says: “For the poor shall never cease out of the land…” (15:11). Ever realistic, the Bible insists that poverty may be an unavoidable – if transitional – part of the human condition.
It may afflict anyone in a variety of circumstances: the young before they get integrated into the economy; mid-career adults who suddenly lose their station in life because of social or personal changes as happens to formerly thriving executives of failed industries, or to prosperous upper-middle-class women suddenly left by their husbands without sufficient resources or skills to cope. In a word, poverty is a difficult and complex problem that resists quick, universal, fix-it solutions.
The Bible therefore insists it is our duty to mitigate the harshness of poverty. “Thou shalt surely open thy hand unto thy poor and needy brother in thy land” (15:11). Do it directly, personally – not by relegating the poor to an anonymous welfare agency which will take care of it with moneys taken from others, at no direct cost to us.
But that was eons before political correctness mandated that we must pay lip service to the war on poverty but personally do little about it. In fact, our search for quick and easy solutions allows populist politicians and a new class of bureaucrats, academicians and their media allies to exploit poverty for ideological, political and remunerative purposes.
The war on poverty is such a bonanza for them that they are understandably reluctant to see anyone make a determined effort to reduce it significantly, especially if this implies any reduction in government welfare hand-outs.
It you think these are harsh charges consider the media outrage and the derision that met Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s promise that he intends to reduce poverty substantially by encouraging rapid economic growth, catapulting Israel into the ranks of the 10 wealthiest nations in the world.
Netanyahu had the temerity to suggest that after over 50 years in which Israel devoted as much as 30% of its bloated government budget (55% of its GNP) to welfare transfer payments – among the highest in Western-style economies – after billions spent on fighting poverty only to have made matters worse, with the number of the poor increasing and the income gap growing, the time has come to adopt more effective policies.
Netanyahu cited as a model the transformation of Ireland, not long ago one of Europe’s poorest countries, into one of its wealthiest, and noted that this astounding achievement was made possible by Ireland’s adoption of free market economy policies. Ireland sharply reduced welfare payments, dramatically cut taxes, enhanced competition and thereby created a pro-business environment.
For this transgression a pack of media mavens, notably Ruth Sinai of Haaretz savaged Netanyahu, claiming his adoption of the Irish model would result – as indeed it has resulted in Ireland, they claim – in increased, rather than diminished, poverty.
Ireland, Sinai warned, leads the European Union in the percentage of those at risk of poverty, namely those whose income falls below 60 percent of the median. Not only is the level of poverty in Ireland high, she claimed with glee, but its dimensions are spreading as the Irish economy grows and becomes richer.
Wonder of wonders: the economy grows and becomes richer, but the number of the poor increases. Should we not conclude that economic growth is bad, that it should be immediately stopped and Ireland returned to the state of equality in poverty? That was the case in communist countries which practiced, at least theoretically, the kind of leveling that the social lobby remembers with nostalgia.
Definitely yes, if you subscribe to the statistical nonsense that is called the “Genie Coefficient” from which the poverty line is extrapolated. It is a contrivance that misrepresents the number of the poor by making it dependent on relative rather than real values, so that if a Bill Gates should settle in Israel importing with him his enormous wealth, tens of thousands of Israelis would fall under the poverty line. That would happen without any change in our real situation, and only because the median income rose when Gates’s wealth lifted the total.
The Genie Coefficient is also grossly misleading because the survey which determines the median income includes only urban households’ income, not independent wage earners and farmers.
The survey also does not include non-cash income, or the income from participation in the black economy, which some economists appraise as 15 percent to 30% of the official GNP. And it makes the dubious claim that people will report their true income to government if they are assured secrecy. So the survey really provides a highly downward tilted estimation of income.
Only political inclination or a wish to be trendy can explain how a serious body such as the Central Bureau of Statistics can lend its name to such a questionable device – one that is misleading and causes so much harm, especially to the poor.
Instead of attacking Netanyahu, Ruth Sinai and her like had better learn more seriously what poverty really is, and how the economic growth that Netanyahu is trying to generate is the only true hope for the poor for extricating themselves from a debilitating culture of poverty.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.