The New Israel Fund’s director, Eliezer Ya’ari, recently denied charges that his fund, and its Shatil subsidiary, are exploiting the single mothers’ protest to promote a radical leftist and anti-Zionist political agenda, and that they have patronizingly imposed the unelected Knafo group as “representative leadership.”
He insisted that the NIF is “an apolitical civic organization” assisting “social change” and human rights, providing a voice to weakened sectors.
Ya’ari never defines what kind of “social change” the NIF promotes, but the fact that almost all of the many organizations Shatil has spawned among immigrants and “development-town” residents espouse a radical leftist ideology, while none are centrist or right, makes it clear.
Like all other NIF spokespersons, Ya’ari speaks in generalities, avoiding any concrete question that could reveal how his $25-million-a-year operation actually implements its noble goals, and how cost-effective it is. But the New Israel’s Fund website provides some answers.
In a section titled “Netanyahu’s Economic Plan” the NIF website concludes that the plan resulted in “the most regressive budget in Israel’s history ” and that it “stands to shred much of what remains of Israel’s social safety net.” It charges that the plan is “stripping the poorest Israelis of some of the last benefits they receive.”
This is sheer nonsense. Israel is spending over $25 billion on transfer payments and other benefits for “the poor,” per capita among the world’s highest, and one of the budget’s biggest items. Any cut in bloated welfare costs is an anathema to the NIF ideologues. Their faith is absolute, despite the fact that Israel is a prime example of the great damage excessive welfare has inflicted on the poor.
The website further charges that Netanyahu’s plan will ruin Israeli democracy. It approvingly quotes Yuval Elbashan and Dr. Danny Guttwein, two academic leftists who charge that Netanyahu “will lead to the liquidation of the welfare state that protects the democratic system (from becoming) a totalitarian state.”
So, to protect democracy, “social change organizations [over 1,500 of them (!), many spawned or promoted by Shatil] are providing analysis and specific arguments against [Netanyahu’s] plan and leading the way to public mobilization and action,” the website reports. The bibliography does not list even one piece defending the plan. So much for pluralism.
Another section, devoted to “Shatil and the Coalitions,” explains “Shatil is working closely with several coalitions to make their public protest, lobbying, advocacy and media activities effective, providing strategic advice and consulting to a broad spectrum of organizations, including new groups that have organized around [resistance to] the economic plan.”
“Many NIF grantees,” the website adds, “are active in the coalition of women’s groups ” and in other similar “coalitions” Shatil has galvanized to undermine the government’s plan. Most are NIF front organizations, often composed of a few paid activists organized and funded by Shatil to promote its political agenda. One example is an unemployment forum that organizes anti-government demonstrations. This, the NIF would have us believe, is apolitical work.
Of course, the NIF has the right to try and convince the public that Netanyahu’s plan is dangerous. It is quite another matter, however, for a tax-exempt organization to organize political lobbying and advocacy groups, together with the political opposition, in order to defeat a plan promulgated by an elected government and force upon it a radical leftist agenda not approved at the ballot box via political agitation sometimes leading to violence.
THE USE by NIF of vague generalities, half-truths and obfuscation to hide its political agenda is revealed in the section devoted to Arab Israelis. “Even though the Netanyahu plan mostly makes cuts,” the website complains, “it includes NIS 56 million for a transfer program called ‘The Removal of Intruders’ It would expedite the transfer of 70,000 Beduin from unrecognized villages to seven ‘legal’ settlements.”
What the NIF does not reveal is that the Beduin who were so loyal to Israel that, unlike other Israeli Arabs, they volunteered in the IDF have over the past decade been subjected to intense anti-Israel indoctrination by Muslim extremists and radical anti-Zionist leftists from Ben-Gurion University.
PLO sympathizers have incited the Beduin to seize large strategic tracts of Negev government land and settle them with illegal “unrecognized settlements,” as the NIF euphemistically puts it. Israeli government mishandling and neglect, bureaucratic heavy-handedness and the failure to impose the law made the situation so inflammatory that the government finally developed a fairly reasonable plan for the resettlement of the Beduin living in those illegal “unrecognized settlements.” They were to be given land in what the NIF mocks as “legal” settlements, in inverted commas.
One wonders whether the NIF’s American and European contributors know that contributions made ostensibly to promote equality and justice are really being used to bash Israel and advance a radical leftist and pro-Palestinian agenda. One wonders what they think they have accomplished for Israel’s poor and weak by spending over $300 million on leftist political agitation, and on the promotion and perpetuation of a welfare system that for the last 50 years has created a debilitating culture of poverty.
Log in or Register
NIF’s not-so-hidden political agenda
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’03
The New Israel Fund’s director, Eliezer Ya’ari, recently denied charges that his fund, and its Shatil subsidiary, are exploiting the single mothers’ protest to promote a radical leftist and anti-Zionist political agenda, and that they have patronizingly imposed the unelected Knafo group as “representative leadership.”
He insisted that the NIF is “an apolitical civic organization” assisting “social change” and human rights, providing a voice to weakened sectors.
Ya’ari never defines what kind of “social change” the NIF promotes, but the fact that almost all of the many organizations Shatil has spawned among immigrants and “development-town” residents espouse a radical leftist ideology, while none are centrist or right, makes it clear.
Filed under:
reform • taxes • Diaspora • Zionism • welfare
Related links
New Israel Fund
Yes, the New Israel Fund helps Vikki Knafo, By Peter B. Edelman, published in The Jerusalem Post
New Israel Fund suggests Netanyahu’s economic plan will lead to totalitarianism
New Israel Fund claims it’s bringing direction to the single parent’s protest
Like all other NIF spokespersons, Ya’ari speaks in generalities, avoiding any concrete question that could reveal how his $25-million-a-year operation actually implements its noble goals, and how cost-effective it is. But the New Israel’s Fund website provides some answers.
In a section titled “Netanyahu’s Economic Plan” the NIF website concludes that the plan resulted in “the most regressive budget in Israel’s history ” and that it “stands to shred much of what remains of Israel’s social safety net.” It charges that the plan is “stripping the poorest Israelis of some of the last benefits they receive.”
This is sheer nonsense. Israel is spending over $25 billion on transfer payments and other benefits for “the poor,” per capita among the world’s highest, and one of the budget’s biggest items. Any cut in bloated welfare costs is an anathema to the NIF ideologues. Their faith is absolute, despite the fact that Israel is a prime example of the great damage excessive welfare has inflicted on the poor.
The website further charges that Netanyahu’s plan will ruin Israeli democracy. It approvingly quotes Yuval Elbashan and Dr. Danny Guttwein, two academic leftists who charge that Netanyahu “will lead to the liquidation of the welfare state that protects the democratic system (from becoming) a totalitarian state.”
So, to protect democracy, “social change organizations [over 1,500 of them (!), many spawned or promoted by Shatil] are providing analysis and specific arguments against [Netanyahu’s] plan and leading the way to public mobilization and action,” the website reports. The bibliography does not list even one piece defending the plan. So much for pluralism.
Another section, devoted to “Shatil and the Coalitions,” explains “Shatil is working closely with several coalitions to make their public protest, lobbying, advocacy and media activities effective, providing strategic advice and consulting to a broad spectrum of organizations, including new groups that have organized around [resistance to] the economic plan.”
“Many NIF grantees,” the website adds, “are active in the coalition of women’s groups ” and in other similar “coalitions” Shatil has galvanized to undermine the government’s plan. Most are NIF front organizations, often composed of a few paid activists organized and funded by Shatil to promote its political agenda. One example is an unemployment forum that organizes anti-government demonstrations. This, the NIF would have us believe, is apolitical work.
Of course, the NIF has the right to try and convince the public that Netanyahu’s plan is dangerous. It is quite another matter, however, for a tax-exempt organization to organize political lobbying and advocacy groups, together with the political opposition, in order to defeat a plan promulgated by an elected government and force upon it a radical leftist agenda not approved at the ballot box via political agitation sometimes leading to violence.
THE USE by NIF of vague generalities, half-truths and obfuscation to hide its political agenda is revealed in the section devoted to Arab Israelis. “Even though the Netanyahu plan mostly makes cuts,” the website complains, “it includes NIS 56 million for a transfer program called ‘The Removal of Intruders’ It would expedite the transfer of 70,000 Beduin from unrecognized villages to seven ‘legal’ settlements.”
What the NIF does not reveal is that the Beduin who were so loyal to Israel that, unlike other Israeli Arabs, they volunteered in the IDF have over the past decade been subjected to intense anti-Israel indoctrination by Muslim extremists and radical anti-Zionist leftists from Ben-Gurion University.
PLO sympathizers have incited the Beduin to seize large strategic tracts of Negev government land and settle them with illegal “unrecognized settlements,” as the NIF euphemistically puts it. Israeli government mishandling and neglect, bureaucratic heavy-handedness and the failure to impose the law made the situation so inflammatory that the government finally developed a fairly reasonable plan for the resettlement of the Beduin living in those illegal “unrecognized settlements.” They were to be given land in what the NIF mocks as “legal” settlements, in inverted commas.
One wonders whether the NIF’s American and European contributors know that contributions made ostensibly to promote equality and justice are really being used to bash Israel and advance a radical leftist and pro-Palestinian agenda. One wonders what they think they have accomplished for Israel’s poor and weak by spending over $300 million on leftist political agitation, and on the promotion and perpetuation of a welfare system that for the last 50 years has created a debilitating culture of poverty.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.