The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
Filed under:
Following 15 years of negotiations, Israel, whose per capita gross domestic product approaches $30,000 (approaching that of Germany), was invited last week to join the OECD’s club of democratic, market-economy countries. After receiving what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu termed “a seal of approval,” Israel is now poised for another quantum leap in its development.
The OECD invitation will make Israel even more attractive for investors and help accelerate the country’s already remarkable growth rates, which in the pre-crisis years was about 5% per annum. Israel withstood the global financial meltdown much better than most industrialized economies, avoiding a recession and the sort of exploding budget deficits we now see in Europe and the U.S.
“This is an important further step in the acceptance of Israel as the advanced economy it is, and of its integration into the global economy,” Stanley Fischer, the governor of the Bank of Israel, told me.
It has been a long haul. Possessing some of the best human capital in the world, Israel was hamstrung from its inception by its Socialist heritage (remember the universally admired kibbutzim, now practically defunct?). Since its founding in 1948, when seven Arab armies attacked the tiny nation of 650,000 at the time, it had to cope not only with several wars and relentless terrorist attacks, with blockades and boycotts, but also with a statist system rife with bureaucracies and monopolies that impaired competition and efficiency. They left the talented Israeli worker half as productive as his American counterpart, and poorly compensated.
Everything used to be nationalized in Israel: land, water, electricity, the banks (in practice), most large industries and businesses, education, and health care. Israelis learned to their chagrin what Americans are now about to find out—that it is sometimes simpler to win wars than to repair the ravages of powerful bureaucracies, especially in education and health care.
In 1984, runaway inflation of an annual 400% and a near financial-market collapse forced Israel to start reforming its anti-productive system. But it was only after the tax cuts, deregulation, and privatization that Benjamin Netanyahu pushed through—first as Israeli prime minister in the late 1990s, and particularly later as finance minister in 2003—that the Israeli economy took off. As George Gilder documented in his riveting book “The Israel Test,” it was then that the country evolved into a “leader of technological progress and scientific advance.” Israeli high tech, Mr. Gilder noted, is the source of some of the most profitable American developments. When you open a computer and read “Intel Inside” it might as well say “Israel Inside.” The most significant innovations of the Intel chip are Israel-made.
Despite its stunning technological prowess that has launched 2,500 startups in a nation of only 7.5 million, Israel was, and still is, inhibited by an anti-productive economic system. Its economy is dominated by about 20 families, who have been able to take advantage of a politicized privatization process and gain control of many of the major assets that once belonged to the government and trade unions. A recent Bank of Israel report noted that these pyramid-style conglomerates control more than half the market assets in Israel. This great concentration of economic and political power, according to the bank, is not only a great impediment to competition and efficiency but may actually expose Israel to extreme risk. A collapse of one of these groups (which was only narrowly avoided recently) might have devastating domino effects on Israeli markets.
The good news is that both the Israeli government and the Bank of Israel say they are prepared to take strong measures to rectify this dangerous situation. These will involve tightening some regulatory practices to make it more difficult for minority owners to gain control of a chain of firms through a highly leveraged pyramid structure. It will also require the abolition of some tax privileges that these pyramid groups enjoy, as well as moves to increase transparency and competition.
The oligarchs will naturally resist with all their considerable might, including help from academic and media “consultants” and from the monopolistic trade union federation. But reformers are determined to continue improving Israel’s economy by further reducing government debt (already cut to 80% of GDP from over a 100% earlier this millennium), cutting taxes, and increasing competition in financial markets.
Joining the OECD will no doubt assist Israel’s development. But it may also put additional burdens on its economy, which is already reeling under the heavy load of welfare costs and transfer payments that consume a third of its $70 billion budget. The powerful Israeli welfare lobby has already announced that it will use the OECD’s comparative statistics to push for increased welfare expenditures.
But generous welfare systems have not worked well for the OECD’s richer members, and have proven devastating for some of its poorer nations, as is evident in Greece. Should OECD “benchmarks” push Israel to increase its high welfare expenditures even more, it will impede the country’s efforts to reduce the already extensive government interference in its economy. We can only hope that Israel’s extraordinary vitality and creativity will again prevail, even in face of such new challenges.
Log in or Register
Land of silicon and money
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
Filed under:
Following 15 years of negotiations, Israel, whose per capita gross domestic product approaches $30,000 (approaching that of Germany), was invited last week to join the OECD’s club of democratic, market-economy countries. After receiving what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu termed “a seal of approval,” Israel is now poised for another quantum leap in its development.
The OECD invitation will make Israel even more attractive for investors and help accelerate the country’s already remarkable growth rates, which in the pre-crisis years was about 5% per annum. Israel withstood the global financial meltdown much better than most industrialized economies, avoiding a recession and the sort of exploding budget deficits we now see in Europe and the U.S.
“This is an important further step in the acceptance of Israel as the advanced economy it is, and of its integration into the global economy,” Stanley Fischer, the governor of the Bank of Israel, told me.
It has been a long haul. Possessing some of the best human capital in the world, Israel was hamstrung from its inception by its Socialist heritage (remember the universally admired kibbutzim, now practically defunct?). Since its founding in 1948, when seven Arab armies attacked the tiny nation of 650,000 at the time, it had to cope not only with several wars and relentless terrorist attacks, with blockades and boycotts, but also with a statist system rife with bureaucracies and monopolies that impaired competition and efficiency. They left the talented Israeli worker half as productive as his American counterpart, and poorly compensated.
Everything used to be nationalized in Israel: land, water, electricity, the banks (in practice), most large industries and businesses, education, and health care. Israelis learned to their chagrin what Americans are now about to find out—that it is sometimes simpler to win wars than to repair the ravages of powerful bureaucracies, especially in education and health care.
In 1984, runaway inflation of an annual 400% and a near financial-market collapse forced Israel to start reforming its anti-productive system. But it was only after the tax cuts, deregulation, and privatization that Benjamin Netanyahu pushed through—first as Israeli prime minister in the late 1990s, and particularly later as finance minister in 2003—that the Israeli economy took off. As George Gilder documented in his riveting book “The Israel Test,” it was then that the country evolved into a “leader of technological progress and scientific advance.” Israeli high tech, Mr. Gilder noted, is the source of some of the most profitable American developments. When you open a computer and read “Intel Inside” it might as well say “Israel Inside.” The most significant innovations of the Intel chip are Israel-made.
Despite its stunning technological prowess that has launched 2,500 startups in a nation of only 7.5 million, Israel was, and still is, inhibited by an anti-productive economic system. Its economy is dominated by about 20 families, who have been able to take advantage of a politicized privatization process and gain control of many of the major assets that once belonged to the government and trade unions. A recent Bank of Israel report noted that these pyramid-style conglomerates control more than half the market assets in Israel. This great concentration of economic and political power, according to the bank, is not only a great impediment to competition and efficiency but may actually expose Israel to extreme risk. A collapse of one of these groups (which was only narrowly avoided recently) might have devastating domino effects on Israeli markets.
The good news is that both the Israeli government and the Bank of Israel say they are prepared to take strong measures to rectify this dangerous situation. These will involve tightening some regulatory practices to make it more difficult for minority owners to gain control of a chain of firms through a highly leveraged pyramid structure. It will also require the abolition of some tax privileges that these pyramid groups enjoy, as well as moves to increase transparency and competition.
The oligarchs will naturally resist with all their considerable might, including help from academic and media “consultants” and from the monopolistic trade union federation. But reformers are determined to continue improving Israel’s economy by further reducing government debt (already cut to 80% of GDP from over a 100% earlier this millennium), cutting taxes, and increasing competition in financial markets.
Joining the OECD will no doubt assist Israel’s development. But it may also put additional burdens on its economy, which is already reeling under the heavy load of welfare costs and transfer payments that consume a third of its $70 billion budget. The powerful Israeli welfare lobby has already announced that it will use the OECD’s comparative statistics to push for increased welfare expenditures.
But generous welfare systems have not worked well for the OECD’s richer members, and have proven devastating for some of its poorer nations, as is evident in Greece. Should OECD “benchmarks” push Israel to increase its high welfare expenditures even more, it will impede the country’s efforts to reduce the already extensive government interference in its economy. We can only hope that Israel’s extraordinary vitality and creativity will again prevail, even in face of such new challenges.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.
The Jerusalem Post
18 Jul ’07
A president of visions
President Shimon Peres, we all know, is a man of visions. Some have been better than others. The less successful ones, that translated into costly, failing and even dangerous policies, were those that denied reality.