Israeli high schools students can finally learn from two new textbooks (“Struggle and Decline, 1920-1945” and “Uprising and State, 1945-1970”) that the reason the Russian Communist Revolution ultimately failed “was the lack of crystallization of a proletariat and a bourgoise class”, and because “the peasant and the worker were not educated and failed to grasp the nature of the communist economy”.
Had they been better “educated” and able to participate, Communism apparently would not have degenerated into a dictatorship, and could have saved humanity from the horrors of capitalism.
Filed under:
education
An issue of the Soviet Isvestia
Israeli high schools students can finally learn from two new textbooks (“Struggle and Decline, 1920-1945” and “Uprising and State, 1945-1970”) that the reason the Russian Communist Revolution ultimately failed “was the lack of crystallization of a proletariat and a bourgoise class”, and because “the peasant and the worker were not educated and failed to grasp the nature of the communist economy”. Had they been better “educated” and able to participate, Communism apparently would not have degenerated into a dictatorship, and could have saved humanity from the horrors of capitalism.
In fairness, according to the Ministry of Education’s new history program, the books (published by Li-Lach Press) do make an effort to be even handed. Their author, Shula Inbar, a history teacher, does not seem to consciously grind an ideological ax. She merely reflects the post-modernist fashion of giving “equal” presentation to “different narratives”. But she does so in the politically correct fashion and with the moral relativism that currently dominate the academic humanities and social “sciences”. She also tries so hard to be “non-judgmental” that the West, and especially Capitalism, seem more morally abominable than murderous Communism.
Inbar presents “The Cold War from different viewpoints”. She first describes “The Cold War from a Conservative (anti-Soviet) viewpoint”, explaining that most “American diplomats [sic] saw the conflict between Russia [sic] and the USA as inevitable because of the aggressive nature of the Kremlin which was rooted in its Communist Anti-Capitalist ideology.” But instead of explaining how Soviet aggression and expansionism made a helpful US (that provided it with massive aid) confrontational, the text suggests that the “conservative” (you know what that means!) attitude was paranoid and gratuitously Anti-Soviet, reflecting the bias of American “diplomats”.
The text becomes explicit when explaining “the Cold War from the Revisionist (corrected) [sic] viewpoint”, which “rejects totally the conservative Anti-Soviet viewpoint, accusing it of distorting Soviet reality and a misunderstanding of its needs [sic]. [Revisionists] claim that the Soviet Union cannot be blamed for the Cold War. The conflict with the USA stemmed from the social and political structure of the American regime. The American economy is mostly capitalist and therefore wishes to dominate foreign markets. The USA follows a policy of expansionism in order to satisfy the interests of American monopolies” etc. Then comes the clinching proof of American mendacity: “This is the basis,” the text proclaims, “of the open door policy of the USA, that promotes free opportunity in foreign markets, a Capitalist-Imperialist policy,” (how “free opportunity” enables the US to dominate markets is not explained). Anyone acquainted with the chronic deficit of the US balance of trade knows such a claim is utter rubbish. Until the last decade, US firms were notoriously laggard in opening foreign markets because they enjoyed a very open, lucrative and expanding internal market. But the hate-America mythmakers are not impressed with facts.
To preserve the appearance of “even-handedness” Inbar then follows with “The Post-Revisionist viewpoint (everyone is guilty)”. She does not even attempt to examine the veracity of the revisionist pro-Soviet propaganda. Guilt is “judiciously” ascribed “evenly”. Both sides “made serious mistakes”, her text proclaims, “and bear equal responsibility for the cold war” – the certainly imperfect USA (that nevertheless struggled to institute full civil rights) and the empire of Gulags that has exterminated (by conservative estimates) over twenty million people.
The ground for such perverse moral equivalency is set by Ms. Inbar when she first describes the Russian Revolution as a deliverance from “exploitative Capitalism” which Marx considered “a disaster to humanity generally and to man particularly”. She gives full vent to vile Communist propaganda, complementing it with five lengthy quotes from Lenin and Trotsky. She makes no attempt to examine or even balance this Marxist “narrative”, or to describe the astounding achievements of Capitalism in promoting welfare and cooperation; nor does she analyze the fact that all Socialist attempts to have government dominate the economy resulted (as they must) in bureaucratization, waste, corruption and tyranny. Of the two background quotes she adds that do not favor Communism, both by Prof. Jacob Talmon, one still compliments Lenin on his great sagacity and leadership and the second seems to excuse his horrendous rule by terror, described as “a small retribution for hundreds of years of oppression and exploitation.” (Similarly, when discussing the Vietnam War Ms. Inbar presents the US as murderous and corrupt, but says nothing about the horrors of Communism).
As a result of such “subtle” indoctrination of students with “progressive” (namely anti-American and Capitalist) attitudes, Israel has come to resemble a third world country not only in its autocratic political rhetoric and practice but also in its laggard economy and strife torn society.
Log in or Register
Indoctrinating our youth
The Jerusalem Post
13 Sep ’00
Israeli high schools students can finally learn from two new textbooks (“Struggle and Decline, 1920-1945” and “Uprising and State, 1945-1970”) that the reason the Russian Communist Revolution ultimately failed “was the lack of crystallization of a proletariat and a bourgoise class”, and because “the peasant and the worker were not educated and failed to grasp the nature of the communist economy”.
Had they been better “educated” and able to participate, Communism apparently would not have degenerated into a dictatorship, and could have saved humanity from the horrors of capitalism.
Filed under:
education
An issue of the Soviet Isvestia
Israeli high schools students can finally learn from two new textbooks (“Struggle and Decline, 1920-1945” and “Uprising and State, 1945-1970”) that the reason the Russian Communist Revolution ultimately failed “was the lack of crystallization of a proletariat and a bourgoise class”, and because “the peasant and the worker were not educated and failed to grasp the nature of the communist economy”. Had they been better “educated” and able to participate, Communism apparently would not have degenerated into a dictatorship, and could have saved humanity from the horrors of capitalism.
In fairness, according to the Ministry of Education’s new history program, the books (published by Li-Lach Press) do make an effort to be even handed. Their author, Shula Inbar, a history teacher, does not seem to consciously grind an ideological ax. She merely reflects the post-modernist fashion of giving “equal” presentation to “different narratives”. But she does so in the politically correct fashion and with the moral relativism that currently dominate the academic humanities and social “sciences”. She also tries so hard to be “non-judgmental” that the West, and especially Capitalism, seem more morally abominable than murderous Communism.
Inbar presents “The Cold War from different viewpoints”. She first describes “The Cold War from a Conservative (anti-Soviet) viewpoint”, explaining that most “American diplomats [sic] saw the conflict between Russia [sic] and the USA as inevitable because of the aggressive nature of the Kremlin which was rooted in its Communist Anti-Capitalist ideology.” But instead of explaining how Soviet aggression and expansionism made a helpful US (that provided it with massive aid) confrontational, the text suggests that the “conservative” (you know what that means!) attitude was paranoid and gratuitously Anti-Soviet, reflecting the bias of American “diplomats”.
The text becomes explicit when explaining “the Cold War from the Revisionist (corrected) [sic] viewpoint”, which “rejects totally the conservative Anti-Soviet viewpoint, accusing it of distorting Soviet reality and a misunderstanding of its needs [sic]. [Revisionists] claim that the Soviet Union cannot be blamed for the Cold War. The conflict with the USA stemmed from the social and political structure of the American regime. The American economy is mostly capitalist and therefore wishes to dominate foreign markets. The USA follows a policy of expansionism in order to satisfy the interests of American monopolies” etc. Then comes the clinching proof of American mendacity: “This is the basis,” the text proclaims, “of the open door policy of the USA, that promotes free opportunity in foreign markets, a Capitalist-Imperialist policy,” (how “free opportunity” enables the US to dominate markets is not explained). Anyone acquainted with the chronic deficit of the US balance of trade knows such a claim is utter rubbish. Until the last decade, US firms were notoriously laggard in opening foreign markets because they enjoyed a very open, lucrative and expanding internal market. But the hate-America mythmakers are not impressed with facts.
To preserve the appearance of “even-handedness” Inbar then follows with “The Post-Revisionist viewpoint (everyone is guilty)”. She does not even attempt to examine the veracity of the revisionist pro-Soviet propaganda. Guilt is “judiciously” ascribed “evenly”. Both sides “made serious mistakes”, her text proclaims, “and bear equal responsibility for the cold war” – the certainly imperfect USA (that nevertheless struggled to institute full civil rights) and the empire of Gulags that has exterminated (by conservative estimates) over twenty million people.
The ground for such perverse moral equivalency is set by Ms. Inbar when she first describes the Russian Revolution as a deliverance from “exploitative Capitalism” which Marx considered “a disaster to humanity generally and to man particularly”. She gives full vent to vile Communist propaganda, complementing it with five lengthy quotes from Lenin and Trotsky. She makes no attempt to examine or even balance this Marxist “narrative”, or to describe the astounding achievements of Capitalism in promoting welfare and cooperation; nor does she analyze the fact that all Socialist attempts to have government dominate the economy resulted (as they must) in bureaucratization, waste, corruption and tyranny. Of the two background quotes she adds that do not favor Communism, both by Prof. Jacob Talmon, one still compliments Lenin on his great sagacity and leadership and the second seems to excuse his horrendous rule by terror, described as “a small retribution for hundreds of years of oppression and exploitation.” (Similarly, when discussing the Vietnam War Ms. Inbar presents the US as murderous and corrupt, but says nothing about the horrors of Communism).
As a result of such “subtle” indoctrination of students with “progressive” (namely anti-American and Capitalist) attitudes, Israel has come to resemble a third world country not only in its autocratic political rhetoric and practice but also in its laggard economy and strife torn society.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.