The anti-capitalist demonstration at the recent Israel Business Conference was mounted by the usual crew: leftist youth and student groups, the Communist Hadash party, gay leftists, the Greens, etc.
But it was also sponsored by supposedly “mainstream” organizations such as the New Israel Fund and the Israel branch of the US Reform Movement.
Filed under:
reform
The (one and only) Israel Electric company
It was probably an excess of testosterone that drove some of the youthful demonstrators to violence (copycatting fashionable anti-globalization happenings) as they rammed home their hopelessly confused messages. But their adolescent proclivity to simple-mindedness and hysteria was obviously inflamed by the intense indoctrination they receive in high schools and youth groups from teachers and leaders brainwashed by the neo-Marxist academic fads dominating our universities’ social sciences and humanities departments. Their ideological mentors turned understandable anger at Israel’s state-controlled regressive economic system, with its glaring inequities and chronic unemployment, into rage against what they label as Israel’s Reagan- and Thatcher-like neo-conservative depraved economic system. As if the centralized, bureaucracy and monopoly-ridden Israeli economy resembles a market economy; as if its tightly knit network of political favoritism and privilege allows for true competition, the lifeblood of capitalism.
So while the young people’s rage is perhaps justified, it is totally misdirected. And the solutions they advocate ן�½�ן�½�ן�½� more transfer payments (which already exceed defense spending!) requiring higher taxes and yet greater state control of the economy ן�½�ן�½�ן�½� are in fact prime causes for the lack of economic growth and for the unemployment disaster. They will make things even worse.
Israel’s low productivity and inflated costs that drastically reduce purchasing power, create the growing gap between the rich, including workers belonging to the powerful monopoly unions, who through their political connections get an excessive share of the pie – and the mass of workers who cannot make ends meet. This is not the result of free markets, but of the extraordinary concentration of politico-economic power in the hands of a few families, their allies in the bureaucracy and the powerful unions, all of whom extract immense benefits from the government.
One Israeli bank alone controls 80 percent of savings (because of bank-favoring tax privileges) and 40% of financial assets, an unparalleled concentration. This enables banks to grant almost unlimited credit to their cronies, often without proper collateral (a fact now coming to haunt them) while starving small or peripheral enterprises.
Israeli monopolies exact a “rent” of between 30% and 50% on all consumer goods, food, clothing, housing, credit, water, transportation, among others. Their inflated prices are responsible for the low purchasing power and for low growth. Government’s huge wasteful bureaucracy consumes more than 50% of GNP, providing shoddy services for which wage earners pay exorbitant taxes. A distorted allocation of resources further blocks growth, cutting employment and wages.
But instead of addressing these real problems, the do-gooders who agitate for “social change” simply advocate more palliatives that have already disastrously weakened the poor: more handouts that made them fatally dependent on government bureaucracies, destroying their sense of self-reliance and worth, and theirs and their children’s prospects of ever extricating themselves from the culture of poverty.
Consider the Forum of Organizations Fighting Unemployment that the aforementioned New Israel Fund sponsors through its “Shatil” (seedling) subsidiary. Shatil organized and subsidized 700 organizations, many of marginal radical leftist (but “sexy”) groups, that form and survive only with cash and organizational help from the New Israel Fund. They have no real grass-roots support for their anti-capitalist and anti-Zionist agendas. Without NIF help they could not have attended the recent Durban Conference to defame Israel as “a slave-exploiting state,” nor could they organize anti-business incitement, such as Saturday night’s demonstration.
The forum sponsored by the NIF agitates for the state to ”... fulfill its obligations as a welfare state? creating employment for the unemployed” no less (as if it can)! The state, it continues ”... must also strengthen” government organs serving the unemployed “contrary to the prevailing view… for the privatization of social services.” It ignores the massive and costly failure of monopolistic government labor exchanges to assist the unemployed.
The fund has devoted millions out of the $100 million it spent on “social change” advocating such failed policies. Its efforts accomplished nothing for workers; they probably made their lot worse.
Now that the fund is raising money not only from US Jewish capitalists – who probably do not understand what it precisely does – but also from Israeli hi-tech entrepreneurs, there is hope that it will finally discard its academic-inspired socialist notions and learn to deal with realities in an economically effective way.
As for the “reform” movement, enjoying little popularity in Israel, it seems so anxious to ingratiate itself that it will even join anti-business demonstrations though it solicits contributions from capitalists.
Log in or Register
Hating the rich
The Jerusalem Post
6 Dec ’01
The anti-capitalist demonstration at the recent Israel Business Conference was mounted by the usual crew: leftist youth and student groups, the Communist Hadash party, gay leftists, the Greens, etc.
But it was also sponsored by supposedly “mainstream” organizations such as the New Israel Fund and the Israel branch of the US Reform Movement.
Filed under:
reform
The (one and only) Israel Electric company
It was probably an excess of testosterone that drove some of the youthful demonstrators to violence (copycatting fashionable anti-globalization happenings) as they rammed home their hopelessly confused messages. But their adolescent proclivity to simple-mindedness and hysteria was obviously inflamed by the intense indoctrination they receive in high schools and youth groups from teachers and leaders brainwashed by the neo-Marxist academic fads dominating our universities’ social sciences and humanities departments. Their ideological mentors turned understandable anger at Israel’s state-controlled regressive economic system, with its glaring inequities and chronic unemployment, into rage against what they label as Israel’s Reagan- and Thatcher-like neo-conservative depraved economic system. As if the centralized, bureaucracy and monopoly-ridden Israeli economy resembles a market economy; as if its tightly knit network of political favoritism and privilege allows for true competition, the lifeblood of capitalism.
So while the young people’s rage is perhaps justified, it is totally misdirected. And the solutions they advocate ן�½�ן�½�ן�½� more transfer payments (which already exceed defense spending!) requiring higher taxes and yet greater state control of the economy ן�½�ן�½�ן�½� are in fact prime causes for the lack of economic growth and for the unemployment disaster. They will make things even worse.
Israel’s low productivity and inflated costs that drastically reduce purchasing power, create the growing gap between the rich, including workers belonging to the powerful monopoly unions, who through their political connections get an excessive share of the pie – and the mass of workers who cannot make ends meet. This is not the result of free markets, but of the extraordinary concentration of politico-economic power in the hands of a few families, their allies in the bureaucracy and the powerful unions, all of whom extract immense benefits from the government.
One Israeli bank alone controls 80 percent of savings (because of bank-favoring tax privileges) and 40% of financial assets, an unparalleled concentration. This enables banks to grant almost unlimited credit to their cronies, often without proper collateral (a fact now coming to haunt them) while starving small or peripheral enterprises.
Israeli monopolies exact a “rent” of between 30% and 50% on all consumer goods, food, clothing, housing, credit, water, transportation, among others. Their inflated prices are responsible for the low purchasing power and for low growth. Government’s huge wasteful bureaucracy consumes more than 50% of GNP, providing shoddy services for which wage earners pay exorbitant taxes. A distorted allocation of resources further blocks growth, cutting employment and wages.
But instead of addressing these real problems, the do-gooders who agitate for “social change” simply advocate more palliatives that have already disastrously weakened the poor: more handouts that made them fatally dependent on government bureaucracies, destroying their sense of self-reliance and worth, and theirs and their children’s prospects of ever extricating themselves from the culture of poverty.
Consider the Forum of Organizations Fighting Unemployment that the aforementioned New Israel Fund sponsors through its “Shatil” (seedling) subsidiary. Shatil organized and subsidized 700 organizations, many of marginal radical leftist (but “sexy”) groups, that form and survive only with cash and organizational help from the New Israel Fund. They have no real grass-roots support for their anti-capitalist and anti-Zionist agendas. Without NIF help they could not have attended the recent Durban Conference to defame Israel as “a slave-exploiting state,” nor could they organize anti-business incitement, such as Saturday night’s demonstration.
The forum sponsored by the NIF agitates for the state to ”... fulfill its obligations as a welfare state? creating employment for the unemployed” no less (as if it can)! The state, it continues ”... must also strengthen” government organs serving the unemployed “contrary to the prevailing view… for the privatization of social services.” It ignores the massive and costly failure of monopolistic government labor exchanges to assist the unemployed.
The fund has devoted millions out of the $100 million it spent on “social change” advocating such failed policies. Its efforts accomplished nothing for workers; they probably made their lot worse.
Now that the fund is raising money not only from US Jewish capitalists – who probably do not understand what it precisely does – but also from Israeli hi-tech entrepreneurs, there is hope that it will finally discard its academic-inspired socialist notions and learn to deal with realities in an economically effective way.
As for the “reform” movement, enjoying little popularity in Israel, it seems so anxious to ingratiate itself that it will even join anti-business demonstrations though it solicits contributions from capitalists.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.