Lenin believed that capitalists would sell their enemies the rope by which they would hang themselves.
Even he probably could not imagine a state that would provide its enemies with the treasure and infrastructure for waging a deadly war against it.
But this is precisely what the Israeli government is doing, by regularly transferring to Arafat and his gang, to this very day, about NIS 50 million a month, while also providing them with safe passage, water and electricity, that enable them to carry on their jihad without too much trouble.
Filed under:
peace process
Lenin believed that capitalists would sell their enemies the rope by which they would hang themselves. Even he probably could not imagine a state that would provide its enemies with the treasure and infrastructure for waging a deadly war against it.
But this is precisely what the Israeli government is doing, by regularly transferring to Arafat and his gang, to this very day, about NIS 50 million a month, while also providing them with safe passage, water and electricity, that enable them to carry on their jihad without too much trouble.
Useful idiots, Lenin called leftist fellow travelers who undermined democracies’ opposition to communist tyranny. Our leaders are no idiots, of course, but they illustrate how a wrong conception can make even brilliant people act stupidly.
Not only have they invited a terrorist organization into our midst and armed it, but they also provide it with the means to arm, reorganize and incite the Palestinian Arabs against us.
Last year Prof. Irving Kristol spoke in Jerusalem about the political stupidity of the Jews. He was mostly referring to the habit of American Jews to promote “liberal” candidates and causes, even though they are often inimical to Jewish interests, even survival.
The bizarre messianic behavior of the Israeli peace camp is an even better example of such stupidity. It maneuvered Israel, a seemingly strong power, into a political trap in which it is held hostage by terrorist gangs. This happened because our best and brightest convinced themselves that a few tens of thousands of armed Palestinians and several hundred Lebanese irregulars were really no match for Israel’s military might, and therefore “we can take risks for peace.”
We subsequently learned that even “small forces” can seriously disrupt civilian life in Israel, and potentially cut Israel’s jugular vein, the communication lines enabling it to mobilize reserves when suddenly attacked.
Yasser Arafat also demonstrated how, with low-level fighting, you can skillfully manipulate world opinion, and how an on-camera “popular uprising” or guerrilla war can tie the hands of our cumbersome military machine; how a small, determined, and murderous dictatorship can intimidate a democracy full of nervous nannies and bleeding hearts.
But the full extent of our peacemakers’ folly revealed itself in their absolute certainty that the putative peace process – by which Israel traded crucial strategic assets for a gangster’s promises – would earn Israel praise and love from “the international community” thus “strengthening its security as no army could.” Apparently intoxicated by Nobel peace prizes and praise from their comrades in the European Socialist International, our leaders seem to have forgotten De Gaulle’s observation that states have no friends, only interests; that Machiavelli’s observations on power politics were a far more valid guide to international conduct than media pundits’ or politicians’ sermons.
States thrive on respect, not on love, and in world affairs, it is the smart, the strong and the agile, not necessarily the just, that usually gets ahead, certainly not the stupid or the weak.
Altogether, it is really puzzling what made our leaders believe that the ethos governing European chancelleries would ever permit them to be even minimally decent towards Israel, when they are convinced that their bread is buttered with Arab oil and money.
Since the European media have a close symbiotic relationship with their foreign policy establishment, one had only to observe how totally biased, dishonest, hypocritical, and ignorant (and often antisemitic) its reporting is, to understand how dastardly are the views of the European foreign policy bureaucracy, even when they attempt to cover them up with diplomatic niceties.
Just a few years after the Holocaust, we ought to remember, the fine souls conducting the foreign policy of many European nations helped equip several Arab armies, which – they could have guessed – hoped to finish off Hitler’s job by destroying a nascent Israel. The Europeans (along with the US) also slapped an arms embargo against Israel, to make their job easier, “to promote peace,” the peace of the graveyard.
And when in 1967, the Arabs were ready for another go at it, European mandarins were happy to eulogize Israel, but extremely upset when it emerged victorious. Later they consistently blinked when their firms were eagerly assisting Iraq, Iran and Libya, and other rogue states, to build unconventional weapons of mass destruction, including a German-built complex for poison gas manufacture.
So to risk Israel’s security to gain the ephemeral “goodwill” of European politicians or base it on Arafat’s promises is surely a kind of madness that the gods usually inflict upon those they wish to destroy.
Luckily Arafat got carried away and played his hand a bit too soon. We therefore still have a chance to learn our lesson and reverse the situation. But will our peace camp let us?
Log in or Register
Fools and rogues
The Jerusalem Post
25 Oct ’00
Lenin believed that capitalists would sell their enemies the rope by which they would hang themselves.
Even he probably could not imagine a state that would provide its enemies with the treasure and infrastructure for waging a deadly war against it.
But this is precisely what the Israeli government is doing, by regularly transferring to Arafat and his gang, to this very day, about NIS 50 million a month, while also providing them with safe passage, water and electricity, that enable them to carry on their jihad without too much trouble.
Filed under:
peace process
Lenin believed that capitalists would sell their enemies the rope by which they would hang themselves. Even he probably could not imagine a state that would provide its enemies with the treasure and infrastructure for waging a deadly war against it.
But this is precisely what the Israeli government is doing, by regularly transferring to Arafat and his gang, to this very day, about NIS 50 million a month, while also providing them with safe passage, water and electricity, that enable them to carry on their jihad without too much trouble.
Useful idiots, Lenin called leftist fellow travelers who undermined democracies’ opposition to communist tyranny. Our leaders are no idiots, of course, but they illustrate how a wrong conception can make even brilliant people act stupidly.
Not only have they invited a terrorist organization into our midst and armed it, but they also provide it with the means to arm, reorganize and incite the Palestinian Arabs against us.
Last year Prof. Irving Kristol spoke in Jerusalem about the political stupidity of the Jews. He was mostly referring to the habit of American Jews to promote “liberal” candidates and causes, even though they are often inimical to Jewish interests, even survival.
The bizarre messianic behavior of the Israeli peace camp is an even better example of such stupidity. It maneuvered Israel, a seemingly strong power, into a political trap in which it is held hostage by terrorist gangs. This happened because our best and brightest convinced themselves that a few tens of thousands of armed Palestinians and several hundred Lebanese irregulars were really no match for Israel’s military might, and therefore “we can take risks for peace.”
We subsequently learned that even “small forces” can seriously disrupt civilian life in Israel, and potentially cut Israel’s jugular vein, the communication lines enabling it to mobilize reserves when suddenly attacked.
Yasser Arafat also demonstrated how, with low-level fighting, you can skillfully manipulate world opinion, and how an on-camera “popular uprising” or guerrilla war can tie the hands of our cumbersome military machine; how a small, determined, and murderous dictatorship can intimidate a democracy full of nervous nannies and bleeding hearts.
But the full extent of our peacemakers’ folly revealed itself in their absolute certainty that the putative peace process – by which Israel traded crucial strategic assets for a gangster’s promises – would earn Israel praise and love from “the international community” thus “strengthening its security as no army could.” Apparently intoxicated by Nobel peace prizes and praise from their comrades in the European Socialist International, our leaders seem to have forgotten De Gaulle’s observation that states have no friends, only interests; that Machiavelli’s observations on power politics were a far more valid guide to international conduct than media pundits’ or politicians’ sermons.
States thrive on respect, not on love, and in world affairs, it is the smart, the strong and the agile, not necessarily the just, that usually gets ahead, certainly not the stupid or the weak.
Altogether, it is really puzzling what made our leaders believe that the ethos governing European chancelleries would ever permit them to be even minimally decent towards Israel, when they are convinced that their bread is buttered with Arab oil and money.
Since the European media have a close symbiotic relationship with their foreign policy establishment, one had only to observe how totally biased, dishonest, hypocritical, and ignorant (and often antisemitic) its reporting is, to understand how dastardly are the views of the European foreign policy bureaucracy, even when they attempt to cover them up with diplomatic niceties.
Just a few years after the Holocaust, we ought to remember, the fine souls conducting the foreign policy of many European nations helped equip several Arab armies, which – they could have guessed – hoped to finish off Hitler’s job by destroying a nascent Israel. The Europeans (along with the US) also slapped an arms embargo against Israel, to make their job easier, “to promote peace,” the peace of the graveyard.
And when in 1967, the Arabs were ready for another go at it, European mandarins were happy to eulogize Israel, but extremely upset when it emerged victorious. Later they consistently blinked when their firms were eagerly assisting Iraq, Iran and Libya, and other rogue states, to build unconventional weapons of mass destruction, including a German-built complex for poison gas manufacture.
So to risk Israel’s security to gain the ephemeral “goodwill” of European politicians or base it on Arafat’s promises is surely a kind of madness that the gods usually inflict upon those they wish to destroy.
Luckily Arafat got carried away and played his hand a bit too soon. We therefore still have a chance to learn our lesson and reverse the situation. But will our peace camp let us?
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.