Arthur Miller’s death was the occasion for almost universal praise.
Critics and writers ignored Miller’s common intellectual malaise of hating his own country because it failed to practice an abstract ideal of perfect justice, while condoning and even supporting extremely repressive regimes because they mouthed the right slogans about human rights, self-determination, equality etc.
Filed under:
education
The death recently of the famous American playwright Arthur Miller has brought into focus again the “problem of the intellectuals”, already extensively discussed in Julien Benda’s 1928 pioneering work, “The Treason of the Intellectuals”. Miller’s death was the occasion for almost universal praise. Critics and writers ignored Miller’s common intellectual malaise of hating his own country because it failed to practice an abstract ideal of perfect justice, while condoning and even supporting extremely repressive regimes because they mouthed the right slogans about human rights, self-determination, equality etc.
You need not be a literary critic, or live in America, to realize that something was badly rotten in the intellectual kingdom. Our own universities support a considerable number of “intellectuals” who condemning Israel for human rights violations but devote their lives to the promotion of a most oppressive Palestinian state. They follow in the footsteps of so many brilliant intellectuals and writers, from Bertrand Russell to Bernard Shaw, from Jean Paul Sartre to Arthur Miller, who condemned democracies but supported the worse tyrannies from Stalin’s and Hitler’s to Mao’s, from Castro’s to Arafat’s and even Saddam Hussein’s. Intellectuals everywhere (not least in Israel) have also supported, and still support, obviously defunct and retrograde ideas, despite the repeated catastrophes they caused. They stuck to these ideas even after the fall of Communism and the social and economic bankruptcy of Socialism. In the service of false utopian ideals and adolescent messianic longings, intellectuals have often sacrificed the values for which they supposedly stand – truth, integrity and responsibility – and have betrayed the oppressed and impoverished masses they pretended to defend. All these bear witness to a persistent perversity in their mind and character.
The great philosopher, Alfred North Whitehead warned of the intellectuals’ proclivity to indulge in what he termed “the fallacy of misplaced concretion”, namely their tendency to ascribe to generalized abstractions a concrete and particular reality. This repeatedly led to their most outrageous violations of common sense. The Social Sciences, and especially political science, but also Sociology and its adjuncts, and even certain schools of philosophy will often refer to “Society” as being such and such, or “wanting” or even “demanding” this or that. As if an abstract notion, “society’’, is a real coherent entity endowed with a mind and with volition, when in fact common sense tells us that “society” is merely an tag referring to a complex conglomerate of groups with various and often conflicting interests (otherwise we would not have politics, would we?).
From treating their abstractions as real, intellectuals make the quick leap of unreason to an imagined Utopia, another absurd and impossible notion that has been perverting so many minds.
As anyone looking in the mirror must recognize, society is obviously not made up of saints or a perfect “humanity”. Therefore the notion that imperfect people could somehow produce a perfect social order is so palpably absurd.
But how could such a pedestrian, common sense thought hope to even curb the great intellectual conceits, like those that presume to know what “social justice” is, or assume that if we just tried hard enough all of life’s natural inequalities could be nullified. How could a conservative skepticism ever curb the great adolescent enthusiasm of true believers in the instant “perfectibility of man”, in “society’s” ability to rapidly mold and change human nature once certain social arrangements get to “revolutionize” history in one fell swoop; if only our believers could convince their obdurate, really perverse opponents, or failing that simply eliminate them.
The intolerance bred by true believing is perhaps why so many intellectuals have become politically tyrannous. Pretending to respect diversity they soon develop what the Talmud described as the Sodomites’ pastime, the measuring of every person on a uniform (presumably ideal) bed, and then cutting or stretching to size those who deviated from the norm. Like their political idols, the world’s tyrants, intellectuals tend when they can (in universities) to enforce obedience through the tactics of the thought police, and through the character assassination of anyone who is contemptuous of their debilitating political correctness. From thought police to re-education or to concentration camps the distance is never great.
We earlier wrote of the risk of isolation that inflicts intellectuals who live in the heady atmosphere of the ivory tower. Not aware of how reality works, intellectuals tend, for example, to treat with condescension or contempt businessmen, since they have learned that profits derive from exploitation. They have no notion what it takes to build and maintain businesses that put bread on their table, nor do they recognize the positive effects of wealth creation, not least its contribution to their life of tenured ease.
We need, of course, ideas, and we need intellectuals trafficking in ideas, even when the majority are mere salesmen of second-hand goods. What we need not subsidize, really, are those intellectual salesmen who are too lazy and irresponsible to base their prescriptions on knowledge. A brief course in basic economics, for example, could probably serve as antidote to a lot of intellectual nonsense and modify, at least, some of their arrogant conviction that besides their field of narrow specialization they also qualify as social reformers, who know how to engineers reality so that it delivers absolute social justice. Now.
Log in or Register
Death of a salesman
The Jerusalem Post
4 Feb ’05
Arthur Miller’s death was the occasion for almost universal praise.
Critics and writers ignored Miller’s common intellectual malaise of hating his own country because it failed to practice an abstract ideal of perfect justice, while condoning and even supporting extremely repressive regimes because they mouthed the right slogans about human rights, self-determination, equality etc.
Filed under:
education
The death recently of the famous American playwright Arthur Miller has brought into focus again the “problem of the intellectuals”, already extensively discussed in Julien Benda’s 1928 pioneering work, “The Treason of the Intellectuals”. Miller’s death was the occasion for almost universal praise. Critics and writers ignored Miller’s common intellectual malaise of hating his own country because it failed to practice an abstract ideal of perfect justice, while condoning and even supporting extremely repressive regimes because they mouthed the right slogans about human rights, self-determination, equality etc.
You need not be a literary critic, or live in America, to realize that something was badly rotten in the intellectual kingdom. Our own universities support a considerable number of “intellectuals” who condemning Israel for human rights violations but devote their lives to the promotion of a most oppressive Palestinian state. They follow in the footsteps of so many brilliant intellectuals and writers, from Bertrand Russell to Bernard Shaw, from Jean Paul Sartre to Arthur Miller, who condemned democracies but supported the worse tyrannies from Stalin’s and Hitler’s to Mao’s, from Castro’s to Arafat’s and even Saddam Hussein’s. Intellectuals everywhere (not least in Israel) have also supported, and still support, obviously defunct and retrograde ideas, despite the repeated catastrophes they caused. They stuck to these ideas even after the fall of Communism and the social and economic bankruptcy of Socialism. In the service of false utopian ideals and adolescent messianic longings, intellectuals have often sacrificed the values for which they supposedly stand – truth, integrity and responsibility – and have betrayed the oppressed and impoverished masses they pretended to defend. All these bear witness to a persistent perversity in their mind and character.
The great philosopher, Alfred North Whitehead warned of the intellectuals’ proclivity to indulge in what he termed “the fallacy of misplaced concretion”, namely their tendency to ascribe to generalized abstractions a concrete and particular reality. This repeatedly led to their most outrageous violations of common sense. The Social Sciences, and especially political science, but also Sociology and its adjuncts, and even certain schools of philosophy will often refer to “Society” as being such and such, or “wanting” or even “demanding” this or that. As if an abstract notion, “society’’, is a real coherent entity endowed with a mind and with volition, when in fact common sense tells us that “society” is merely an tag referring to a complex conglomerate of groups with various and often conflicting interests (otherwise we would not have politics, would we?).
From treating their abstractions as real, intellectuals make the quick leap of unreason to an imagined Utopia, another absurd and impossible notion that has been perverting so many minds.
As anyone looking in the mirror must recognize, society is obviously not made up of saints or a perfect “humanity”. Therefore the notion that imperfect people could somehow produce a perfect social order is so palpably absurd.
But how could such a pedestrian, common sense thought hope to even curb the great intellectual conceits, like those that presume to know what “social justice” is, or assume that if we just tried hard enough all of life’s natural inequalities could be nullified. How could a conservative skepticism ever curb the great adolescent enthusiasm of true believers in the instant “perfectibility of man”, in “society’s” ability to rapidly mold and change human nature once certain social arrangements get to “revolutionize” history in one fell swoop; if only our believers could convince their obdurate, really perverse opponents, or failing that simply eliminate them.
The intolerance bred by true believing is perhaps why so many intellectuals have become politically tyrannous. Pretending to respect diversity they soon develop what the Talmud described as the Sodomites’ pastime, the measuring of every person on a uniform (presumably ideal) bed, and then cutting or stretching to size those who deviated from the norm. Like their political idols, the world’s tyrants, intellectuals tend when they can (in universities) to enforce obedience through the tactics of the thought police, and through the character assassination of anyone who is contemptuous of their debilitating political correctness. From thought police to re-education or to concentration camps the distance is never great.
We earlier wrote of the risk of isolation that inflicts intellectuals who live in the heady atmosphere of the ivory tower. Not aware of how reality works, intellectuals tend, for example, to treat with condescension or contempt businessmen, since they have learned that profits derive from exploitation. They have no notion what it takes to build and maintain businesses that put bread on their table, nor do they recognize the positive effects of wealth creation, not least its contribution to their life of tenured ease.
We need, of course, ideas, and we need intellectuals trafficking in ideas, even when the majority are mere salesmen of second-hand goods. What we need not subsidize, really, are those intellectual salesmen who are too lazy and irresponsible to base their prescriptions on knowledge. A brief course in basic economics, for example, could probably serve as antidote to a lot of intellectual nonsense and modify, at least, some of their arrogant conviction that besides their field of narrow specialization they also qualify as social reformers, who know how to engineers reality so that it delivers absolute social justice. Now.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.