In a recent European poll, Israel was chosen as the state most dangerous to world peace.
Those who wonder why need only read or watch the European media.
For example, the BBC’s recent film “Israel’s Secret Weapons”, part of an effort to delegitimize Bush’s invasion of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, intimates that the US should focus instead on disarming Israel.
In a recent European poll, Israel was chosen as the state most dangerous to world peace. Those who wonder why need only read or watch the European media. For example, the BBC’s recent film “Israel’s Secret Weapons”, part of an effort to delegitimize Bush’s invasion of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, intimates that the US should focus instead on disarming Israel. The film was shown in the Jerusalem Cinematheque’s British film week sponsored by the British Council. Beware of Brits bearing gifts! This is not the first time that the BBC has taken on Israel in an effort to delegitimize it.
From the beginning of the Al-Aksa Intifada in 2000, the BBC’s reports were routinely skewed in favor of Arafat’s terrorist regime. The BBC regularly suggested that Israel was the prime instigator of “the cycle of violence”. It accused Israel of killing far more Arab children than even official PA numbers—known for their gross exaggeration—dared to claim.
In November 2000 the BBC sunk to the nadir of its pathological hatred for Israel, revealing the depth of its anti-Semitic bias. It opened a program about Palestinian children killed in the Intifada (many while being used as human shields) by presenting as fact, complete with shots of skulls, the ancient anti-Semitic calumny of “Herod’s massacre of the innocents”. Cutting straight from the skull-stuffed crypt (adult skulls, mind you) which the BBC describes as the actual location where an ancient “massacre” of children occurred to Manger Square where a funeral was taking place of an Arab boy “shot through the head” (gangster style) by Israeli troops, the BBC brazenly drew a straight line connecting an alleged attempt to kill the child Christ to Israel’s killing of Palestinian children.
Throughout the Intifada, the BBC repeated, with no collaborating evidence, the worst Arab fabrications and calumnies. In its expositions of the background to the conflict it always endorsed the Palestinian narrative, though it must be well aware that it is historically false. The many Arabs present on the BBC’s talk shows can spread any calumny about Israel and they will never be challenged by the BBC anchorpersons. Nor will the BBC allow a proper rebuttal by Israelis. For “balance” the BBC carefully chooses pro-Arab Israelis or some fumbling official from our pitiful foreign ministry. Anyone who is capable of mounting an effective rebuttal to the BBC distortions and lies will never be invited to speak.
Besides its news broadcasts, the BBC has been devoting several special programs to the task of delegitimizing Israel. A memorable hatchet job was the Panorama program framing Prime Minister Sharon as the real killer of innocent Palestinians in the Sabra and Shatila massacre performed by Christian Lebanese troupes. Their whole “case” was woven from a tissue of lies, distortions, significant omissions, allegations lacking any factual basis and a sickening animus toward Sharon and Israel.
The same malevolent spirit animates “Israel’s Secret Weapon”. The film asks which state harbors the most dangerous weapons of mass destruction, refusing to let anyone inspect them. It portrays Israel as a police state that commits atrocities just like Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, a state that punished its virtuous whistleblower, Mordecai Vanunu (whom the film compares with Andrei Sacharov), in the most cruel and illegal manner. Everyone in the film condemns Israel except for Shimon Peres, whom the film’s director Olenka Frenkiel manipulates by asking him long leading questions and then cutting Peres’s responses to the bare minimum. When the dishonest Frenkiel asks Peres why Israel should not be treated just like Iraq and the outraged Peres responds with “how could you compare, when Saddam killed so many innocent people and used gas against the Iranians and the Kurds? Olenka’s response is: “Some do compare.” We soon find who: the film cuts to two sequences, the first showing the Sabra and Shatilla massacre, suggesting Sharon is the killer, and the second showing the alleged use by Israel of some mysterious gas against civilians in Gaza. Both sequences are based on falsehoods, but they establish the comparison between Israel and Iraq’s Saddam.
The film was followed by a panel discussion moderated by the IBA’s David Wiztum. It was heartening to hear how even those who generally criticize Israeli policies from the left were shocked by the BBC animus and bias. The generally cool Wiztum spoke in anger and even Ha’aretz’s Danny Rubinstein, who is sympathetic to the PA, pointed to the film’s gross errors and distortions. Another panelist, Ms. Lynda Grant, a writer for The Guardian, deplored the tendency of journalists to cast themselves as crusaders for a cause rather than report facts.
Prof. Wistrich, a Hebrew University expert on anti-Semitism, said that “the documentary tries to suggest that Israel is the real rogue regime in the Middle East, an axis of evil, a state more dangerous than Saddam’s Iraq. It tells us that Dimona, not Baghdad, should be the target, that Mordechai Vanunu was a hero and saint, unjustly prosecuted by a quasi-police state masquerading as a democracy.” Israel’s precarious position as the only state threatened with extinction was never mentioned in the film.
“Such a distorted documentary in the current British climate can only inflame anti-Israel feelings and antipathy to Jews still further,” Prof. Wistrich concluded.
But the BBC representative stonewalled. He though the film was a “cracking good yarn,” like soap opera stuff, and he refused to address any of the distortions and the lies it contained.
In the 1947-8 War of Independence British policemen and soldiers disarmed Haganah members and then left them among Arab crowds to be cut to pieces. The BBC is trying to do the same to Israel. By portraying it as the worst criminal state and by totally whitewashing Arab dictatorships, especially the gangster-ruled Palestinian Authority, which it casts in the role of the just underdog, fighting against oppression, the BBC tries to disarm Israel morally and politically. As the panel discussion indicated, it is no use to plead with the BBC for fairness, decency or justice. It is determined in its mission.
It is time for Israel to recognize who its enemies are, and to protect itself from them.
Log in or Register
The BBC’s hatred for Israel
The Jerusalem Post
29 Jan ’04
In a recent European poll, Israel was chosen as the state most dangerous to world peace.
Those who wonder why need only read or watch the European media.
For example, the BBC’s recent film “Israel’s Secret Weapons”, part of an effort to delegitimize Bush’s invasion of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, intimates that the US should focus instead on disarming Israel.
Filed under:
media
Related links
BBC
In a recent European poll, Israel was chosen as the state most dangerous to world peace. Those who wonder why need only read or watch the European media. For example, the BBC’s recent film “Israel’s Secret Weapons”, part of an effort to delegitimize Bush’s invasion of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, intimates that the US should focus instead on disarming Israel. The film was shown in the Jerusalem Cinematheque’s British film week sponsored by the British Council. Beware of Brits bearing gifts! This is not the first time that the BBC has taken on Israel in an effort to delegitimize it.
From the beginning of the Al-Aksa Intifada in 2000, the BBC’s reports were routinely skewed in favor of Arafat’s terrorist regime. The BBC regularly suggested that Israel was the prime instigator of “the cycle of violence”. It accused Israel of killing far more Arab children than even official PA numbers—known for their gross exaggeration—dared to claim.
In November 2000 the BBC sunk to the nadir of its pathological hatred for Israel, revealing the depth of its anti-Semitic bias. It opened a program about Palestinian children killed in the Intifada (many while being used as human shields) by presenting as fact, complete with shots of skulls, the ancient anti-Semitic calumny of “Herod’s massacre of the innocents”. Cutting straight from the skull-stuffed crypt (adult skulls, mind you) which the BBC describes as the actual location where an ancient “massacre” of children occurred to Manger Square where a funeral was taking place of an Arab boy “shot through the head” (gangster style) by Israeli troops, the BBC brazenly drew a straight line connecting an alleged attempt to kill the child Christ to Israel’s killing of Palestinian children.
Throughout the Intifada, the BBC repeated, with no collaborating evidence, the worst Arab fabrications and calumnies. In its expositions of the background to the conflict it always endorsed the Palestinian narrative, though it must be well aware that it is historically false. The many Arabs present on the BBC’s talk shows can spread any calumny about Israel and they will never be challenged by the BBC anchorpersons. Nor will the BBC allow a proper rebuttal by Israelis. For “balance” the BBC carefully chooses pro-Arab Israelis or some fumbling official from our pitiful foreign ministry. Anyone who is capable of mounting an effective rebuttal to the BBC distortions and lies will never be invited to speak.
Besides its news broadcasts, the BBC has been devoting several special programs to the task of delegitimizing Israel. A memorable hatchet job was the Panorama program framing Prime Minister Sharon as the real killer of innocent Palestinians in the Sabra and Shatila massacre performed by Christian Lebanese troupes. Their whole “case” was woven from a tissue of lies, distortions, significant omissions, allegations lacking any factual basis and a sickening animus toward Sharon and Israel.
The same malevolent spirit animates “Israel’s Secret Weapon”. The film asks which state harbors the most dangerous weapons of mass destruction, refusing to let anyone inspect them. It portrays Israel as a police state that commits atrocities just like Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, a state that punished its virtuous whistleblower, Mordecai Vanunu (whom the film compares with Andrei Sacharov), in the most cruel and illegal manner. Everyone in the film condemns Israel except for Shimon Peres, whom the film’s director Olenka Frenkiel manipulates by asking him long leading questions and then cutting Peres’s responses to the bare minimum. When the dishonest Frenkiel asks Peres why Israel should not be treated just like Iraq and the outraged Peres responds with “how could you compare, when Saddam killed so many innocent people and used gas against the Iranians and the Kurds? Olenka’s response is: “Some do compare.” We soon find who: the film cuts to two sequences, the first showing the Sabra and Shatilla massacre, suggesting Sharon is the killer, and the second showing the alleged use by Israel of some mysterious gas against civilians in Gaza. Both sequences are based on falsehoods, but they establish the comparison between Israel and Iraq’s Saddam.
The film was followed by a panel discussion moderated by the IBA’s David Wiztum. It was heartening to hear how even those who generally criticize Israeli policies from the left were shocked by the BBC animus and bias. The generally cool Wiztum spoke in anger and even Ha’aretz’s Danny Rubinstein, who is sympathetic to the PA, pointed to the film’s gross errors and distortions. Another panelist, Ms. Lynda Grant, a writer for The Guardian, deplored the tendency of journalists to cast themselves as crusaders for a cause rather than report facts.
Prof. Wistrich, a Hebrew University expert on anti-Semitism, said that “the documentary tries to suggest that Israel is the real rogue regime in the Middle East, an axis of evil, a state more dangerous than Saddam’s Iraq. It tells us that Dimona, not Baghdad, should be the target, that Mordechai Vanunu was a hero and saint, unjustly prosecuted by a quasi-police state masquerading as a democracy.” Israel’s precarious position as the only state threatened with extinction was never mentioned in the film.
“Such a distorted documentary in the current British climate can only inflame anti-Israel feelings and antipathy to Jews still further,” Prof. Wistrich concluded.
But the BBC representative stonewalled. He though the film was a “cracking good yarn,” like soap opera stuff, and he refused to address any of the distortions and the lies it contained.
In the 1947-8 War of Independence British policemen and soldiers disarmed Haganah members and then left them among Arab crowds to be cut to pieces. The BBC is trying to do the same to Israel. By portraying it as the worst criminal state and by totally whitewashing Arab dictatorships, especially the gangster-ruled Palestinian Authority, which it casts in the role of the just underdog, fighting against oppression, the BBC tries to disarm Israel morally and politically. As the panel discussion indicated, it is no use to plead with the BBC for fairness, decency or justice. It is determined in its mission.
It is time for Israel to recognize who its enemies are, and to protect itself from them.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.