If anyone had doubts about the corrupting effects of the absolute economic and financial power our bank duopoly wields, the multi-million shekel campaign they have recently launched in an effort to block Netanyahu’s bold financial market reform, should remove them.
The campaign has revealed to what length the bankers are willing to go in order to preserve a monopolistic system that has enriched them personally but has impoverished everyone else, a system that is responsible for most of the ills afflicting the Israeli economy.
Filed under:
financial markets
Israel's bank duopoly
If anyone had doubts about the corrupting effects of the absolute economic and financial power our bank duopoly wields, the multi-million shekel campaign they have recently launched in an effort to block Netanyahu’s bold financial market reform, should remove them. The campaign has revealed to what length the bankers are willing to go in order to preserve a monopolistic system that has enriched them personally but has impoverished everyone else, a system that is responsible for most of the ills afflicting the Israeli economy.
The banks have taken dozens of full-page ads, radio spots and TV commercials. They have plastered our streets with hundreds of huge billboards in an unprecedented campaign designed to convince us that they run a successful and stable industry that promotes a healthy economy, and that any changes forced upon them will not only destroy their vital operation, but the whole Israeli economy.
To bolster this preposterous claim the bankers quote an old (year 2000) report by the International Monetary Fund that ostensibly confirms their good standing.What the Bankers neglect to mention is that the same report also referred to the exceedingly high concentration in the industry that involves them in many conflicts of interest and endangering customers’ rights. They also habitually fail to mention the many public commissions, starting with the post bank share collapse Beijsky commission, that over twenty years ago recommended breaking up the banking oligolopoly; nor the several other (Brodet) commissions reports which followed with similar recommendations, or the damning State Comptroller reports that exposed banks malpractices. Most significantly, they do not reveal that in the sale agreement of Ha’poalim, the government preserved the right to make structural changes as the present reform stipulates.
The bankers also resort to scare tactics and threats by claiming that a comprehensive reform will damage the banks’ stability, with catastrophic results. But what stability do they allude to? How can anyone typify a banking system that brought the Israeli economy to the verge of ruin not once, but thrice, as “stable”? In the mid eighties the banks almost destroyed the Israeli economy and caused a decade of non-growth by their illegal, reckless share manipulation. In ninety-three, at a height of a stock exchange bubble, the banks seduced thousands of clients with easy credit and prompted them to recklessly invest in bank funds trading in shares. When the bubble burst, thousand of families lost their life savings. And only about a year and a half ago, the banks brought us to the verge of an Argentinian crisis, by lending 70% of all credit to 1% of borrowers, all the bankers’ cronies. These subsidized loans, lacking proper collateral, were used for highly leveraged, risky deals in real estate and entertainment. When the deals failed, the banks were left with 61.4 billion shekels in doubtful debts (after already erasing many billions in bad debts). The banks’ capital base is only 45 billion shekels! The bankers covered up their dismal failure in what is supposed to be their core business, loan giving, by gouging households. They imposed hundreds of arcane inscrutable commissions, including, until recently, a line payment, for every entry in the monthly statements. They take usurious rates from families that resort to the bank invented “overdrafts”. As a result, Israeli banks make most of their profits from households, forcing them to subsidize in effect their habitually bad business loans.The destruction by the banks of twenty years of the public savings had disastrous consequences for the Israeli economy: two decades of non growth, massive unemployment, very low wages and hundreds of thousands of families barely eking out a living. Exacerbated social problems have created a massive drain on the government budget, with over a third devoted to transfer payments.
The banks are also responsible for enlarging the income gap in Israel. The salaries paid to the excessive number of bank workers are three times the average Israeli salary, and the inflated salaries and millions in perks and bonuses that the banks’ higher hierarchy allots itself, contribute to this growing gap. But what mostly contributes to it is the annual transfer of many billions of shekels from low and middle-income savers to the dozen and a half families and entities that own the banks. The banks use their duopoly powers to deny savers true market rates on their savings (as evident from the over 5% financial spread). It is truly a huge bank robbery of savers.
To fight the proposed Netanyahu reform, the banks are manipulating polls. They present in their ads plain folk with fictitious addresses who ostensibly are so happy with the banks stability and performance that they do not want the government to force the banks to sell their provident and mutual funds.
We are not told that these hapless people are captives in funds to which the banks repeatedly sold worthless shares in companies that owe them a mint. We are not told that the banks funds performance is dismal, half that of private funds and with much greater risk
Again, our failing bankers use fabrications, personal attacks and threats to protect their excessive power and riches. For twenty years these tactics worked and paid them handsomely. For twenty years they have bamboozled the public and intimidated government officials and Knesset members, successfully managing to shelve any reform.
Log in or Register
The banks fight dirty
The Jerusalem Post
4 Sep ’04
If anyone had doubts about the corrupting effects of the absolute economic and financial power our bank duopoly wields, the multi-million shekel campaign they have recently launched in an effort to block Netanyahu’s bold financial market reform, should remove them.
The campaign has revealed to what length the bankers are willing to go in order to preserve a monopolistic system that has enriched them personally but has impoverished everyone else, a system that is responsible for most of the ills afflicting the Israeli economy.
Filed under:
financial markets
Israel's bank duopoly
If anyone had doubts about the corrupting effects of the absolute economic and financial power our bank duopoly wields, the multi-million shekel campaign they have recently launched in an effort to block Netanyahu’s bold financial market reform, should remove them. The campaign has revealed to what length the bankers are willing to go in order to preserve a monopolistic system that has enriched them personally but has impoverished everyone else, a system that is responsible for most of the ills afflicting the Israeli economy.
The banks have taken dozens of full-page ads, radio spots and TV commercials. They have plastered our streets with hundreds of huge billboards in an unprecedented campaign designed to convince us that they run a successful and stable industry that promotes a healthy economy, and that any changes forced upon them will not only destroy their vital operation, but the whole Israeli economy.
To bolster this preposterous claim the bankers quote an old (year 2000) report by the International Monetary Fund that ostensibly confirms their good standing.What the Bankers neglect to mention is that the same report also referred to the exceedingly high concentration in the industry that involves them in many conflicts of interest and endangering customers’ rights. They also habitually fail to mention the many public commissions, starting with the post bank share collapse Beijsky commission, that over twenty years ago recommended breaking up the banking oligolopoly; nor the several other (Brodet) commissions reports which followed with similar recommendations, or the damning State Comptroller reports that exposed banks malpractices. Most significantly, they do not reveal that in the sale agreement of Ha’poalim, the government preserved the right to make structural changes as the present reform stipulates.
The bankers also resort to scare tactics and threats by claiming that a comprehensive reform will damage the banks’ stability, with catastrophic results. But what stability do they allude to? How can anyone typify a banking system that brought the Israeli economy to the verge of ruin not once, but thrice, as “stable”? In the mid eighties the banks almost destroyed the Israeli economy and caused a decade of non-growth by their illegal, reckless share manipulation. In ninety-three, at a height of a stock exchange bubble, the banks seduced thousands of clients with easy credit and prompted them to recklessly invest in bank funds trading in shares. When the bubble burst, thousand of families lost their life savings. And only about a year and a half ago, the banks brought us to the verge of an Argentinian crisis, by lending 70% of all credit to 1% of borrowers, all the bankers’ cronies. These subsidized loans, lacking proper collateral, were used for highly leveraged, risky deals in real estate and entertainment. When the deals failed, the banks were left with 61.4 billion shekels in doubtful debts (after already erasing many billions in bad debts). The banks’ capital base is only 45 billion shekels! The bankers covered up their dismal failure in what is supposed to be their core business, loan giving, by gouging households. They imposed hundreds of arcane inscrutable commissions, including, until recently, a line payment, for every entry in the monthly statements. They take usurious rates from families that resort to the bank invented “overdrafts”. As a result, Israeli banks make most of their profits from households, forcing them to subsidize in effect their habitually bad business loans.The destruction by the banks of twenty years of the public savings had disastrous consequences for the Israeli economy: two decades of non growth, massive unemployment, very low wages and hundreds of thousands of families barely eking out a living. Exacerbated social problems have created a massive drain on the government budget, with over a third devoted to transfer payments.
The banks are also responsible for enlarging the income gap in Israel. The salaries paid to the excessive number of bank workers are three times the average Israeli salary, and the inflated salaries and millions in perks and bonuses that the banks’ higher hierarchy allots itself, contribute to this growing gap. But what mostly contributes to it is the annual transfer of many billions of shekels from low and middle-income savers to the dozen and a half families and entities that own the banks. The banks use their duopoly powers to deny savers true market rates on their savings (as evident from the over 5% financial spread). It is truly a huge bank robbery of savers.
To fight the proposed Netanyahu reform, the banks are manipulating polls. They present in their ads plain folk with fictitious addresses who ostensibly are so happy with the banks stability and performance that they do not want the government to force the banks to sell their provident and mutual funds.
We are not told that these hapless people are captives in funds to which the banks repeatedly sold worthless shares in companies that owe them a mint. We are not told that the banks funds performance is dismal, half that of private funds and with much greater risk
Again, our failing bankers use fabrications, personal attacks and threats to protect their excessive power and riches. For twenty years these tactics worked and paid them handsomely. For twenty years they have bamboozled the public and intimidated government officials and Knesset members, successfully managing to shelve any reform.
Will we let them succeed again?
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.