The just-inaugurated Lauder School of Government’s conference on Assessing Israel’s National Strength comes at a propitious moment.
Israel faces grave problems, and both its internal and external policies seem confused and wavering.
It is therefore vital for key government, defense, industry and public figures to reconsider such basic issues as the components of national strength, the strategic environment, and what the peace process has achieved.
Filed under:
public policy
An Israeli shopping mall with F-16 fighter plane
Refreshingly, Dr. Uzi Arad’s Institute of Policy and Strategy (to whose board this writer belongs) has approached national security in its widest sense, not merely as military strength. It also analyzed the economic, technological and geo-political underpinning of national security, as well as education and science, demography, the Zionist ethos and morale.
This is no mean achievement. For decades, Israel’s security issues have totally overshadowed any other vital matter, certainly economic concerns. Consequently, in the last decade alone, Israel’s rigid, anti-productive, bureaucratized economic “system” has almost halted productivity growth. This resulted in a conservatively estimated loss of 100 billion dollars in national product. Imagine what use, just for defense purposes, such a sum could make, since it is equivalent to 50 years of American military aid!
Strategic planners often seem oblivious to the economy’s importance, though lack of economic growth is also behind most of Israel’s social ills, from unemployment to dismal salary levels. Excessive dependence on government handouts, and fierce competition for government favor are aggravating social fragmentation, and destroy the social cohesion that societies in danger must strive to maintain. They also break apart political parties, making Israel so hard to govern.
Or take education. Israel’s future depends on its brainpower. It gives it both an edge of technological superiority that can compensate for Arab superiority in numbers and weaponry, and it ensures its economic viability through export-oriented growth. Yet, despite immense resources put at its disposal (among the highest per capita in the world) the educational system is in shambles, progressively producing less and less literate students.
This should not surprise anyone acquainted with the outdated (though faddish) bureaucratized, centralized government controlled (hence politicized) educational system. By eliminating competition and accountability, by not offering rewards for creativity or excellence, it promotes mediocrity and illiteracy. Politicized governmental bureaucracies are innately incapable of performing complex tasks – they can barely manage the removal of garbage or sewer maintenance – so to have them provide education is to court the disaster we have. Only by introducing some competition into the educational system through a voucher system that offers educational choice to enough parents and students, (and increasing equal opportunity by giving lower income strata higher worth vouchers to buy better education) is there hope for improvement.
Practically every problem the conference tackles was caused by excessive government intervention, either through direct meddling or through the creation of wrong incentives. Excessive intervention also prevents government from performing vital functions it is supposed to fulfill, the creation of a good framework of law and a supporting environment for development. Nowhere is this clearer than in our hi-tech, where Israel’s excellent “human capital” provides it with strong relative advantage. Yet unless government policy on laws of incorporation, mergers and taxation will change soon, Israel will lose most of its high yielding hi-tech companies. Some are already in the process of migrating to better environments, and many will follow simply because they cannot otherwise compete successfully and survive. Here is a clear-cut example of how our derelict economic system is literally slaughtering the geese that lay the golden eggs.
The conference also signals a greater openness by the defense establishment to discuss in an open forum security questions such as strategy and deterrence. Hopefully in the follow up to the conference more outside voices can be brought in. Not that the discussants, the highest brass, are not each an authority in his field. But, like authorities everywhere, they still need to hear serious voices of dissent, those who could challenge accepted wisdom and provoke fresh consideration and thought.
The defense establishment is so formidable and hierarchical, that while it commands some of the best and brightest, it is in danger of becoming inbred and conformist. In the past this resulted in the inability to overcome a wrong conception prior to the Yom Kippur War or to successfully tackle the Intifada. A public conference dealing with security must therefore strive, as the Herzliya Conference, to ask new questions and include more outside participants. They could discuss such issues as how to make a more efficient use of the defense budget, and address serious questions of morale and of basic values. If such open discussion will take place both in between conferences and in future ones, it will enhance their “added value”, as well as their future usefulness and importance.
Log in or Register
Assessing Israel’s national strength
The Jerusalem Post
21 Dec ’00
The just-inaugurated Lauder School of Government’s conference on Assessing Israel’s National Strength comes at a propitious moment.
Israel faces grave problems, and both its internal and external policies seem confused and wavering.
It is therefore vital for key government, defense, industry and public figures to reconsider such basic issues as the components of national strength, the strategic environment, and what the peace process has achieved.
Filed under:
public policy
An Israeli shopping mall with F-16 fighter plane
Refreshingly, Dr. Uzi Arad’s Institute of Policy and Strategy (to whose board this writer belongs) has approached national security in its widest sense, not merely as military strength. It also analyzed the economic, technological and geo-political underpinning of national security, as well as education and science, demography, the Zionist ethos and morale.
This is no mean achievement. For decades, Israel’s security issues have totally overshadowed any other vital matter, certainly economic concerns. Consequently, in the last decade alone, Israel’s rigid, anti-productive, bureaucratized economic “system” has almost halted productivity growth. This resulted in a conservatively estimated loss of 100 billion dollars in national product. Imagine what use, just for defense purposes, such a sum could make, since it is equivalent to 50 years of American military aid!
Strategic planners often seem oblivious to the economy’s importance, though lack of economic growth is also behind most of Israel’s social ills, from unemployment to dismal salary levels. Excessive dependence on government handouts, and fierce competition for government favor are aggravating social fragmentation, and destroy the social cohesion that societies in danger must strive to maintain. They also break apart political parties, making Israel so hard to govern.
Or take education. Israel’s future depends on its brainpower. It gives it both an edge of technological superiority that can compensate for Arab superiority in numbers and weaponry, and it ensures its economic viability through export-oriented growth. Yet, despite immense resources put at its disposal (among the highest per capita in the world) the educational system is in shambles, progressively producing less and less literate students.
This should not surprise anyone acquainted with the outdated (though faddish) bureaucratized, centralized government controlled (hence politicized) educational system. By eliminating competition and accountability, by not offering rewards for creativity or excellence, it promotes mediocrity and illiteracy. Politicized governmental bureaucracies are innately incapable of performing complex tasks – they can barely manage the removal of garbage or sewer maintenance – so to have them provide education is to court the disaster we have. Only by introducing some competition into the educational system through a voucher system that offers educational choice to enough parents and students, (and increasing equal opportunity by giving lower income strata higher worth vouchers to buy better education) is there hope for improvement.
Practically every problem the conference tackles was caused by excessive government intervention, either through direct meddling or through the creation of wrong incentives. Excessive intervention also prevents government from performing vital functions it is supposed to fulfill, the creation of a good framework of law and a supporting environment for development. Nowhere is this clearer than in our hi-tech, where Israel’s excellent “human capital” provides it with strong relative advantage. Yet unless government policy on laws of incorporation, mergers and taxation will change soon, Israel will lose most of its high yielding hi-tech companies. Some are already in the process of migrating to better environments, and many will follow simply because they cannot otherwise compete successfully and survive. Here is a clear-cut example of how our derelict economic system is literally slaughtering the geese that lay the golden eggs.
The conference also signals a greater openness by the defense establishment to discuss in an open forum security questions such as strategy and deterrence. Hopefully in the follow up to the conference more outside voices can be brought in. Not that the discussants, the highest brass, are not each an authority in his field. But, like authorities everywhere, they still need to hear serious voices of dissent, those who could challenge accepted wisdom and provoke fresh consideration and thought.
The defense establishment is so formidable and hierarchical, that while it commands some of the best and brightest, it is in danger of becoming inbred and conformist. In the past this resulted in the inability to overcome a wrong conception prior to the Yom Kippur War or to successfully tackle the Intifada. A public conference dealing with security must therefore strive, as the Herzliya Conference, to ask new questions and include more outside participants. They could discuss such issues as how to make a more efficient use of the defense budget, and address serious questions of morale and of basic values. If such open discussion will take place both in between conferences and in future ones, it will enhance their “added value”, as well as their future usefulness and importance.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.