Superficially, the division of Jerusalem may seem justified, on practical as well as moral grounds. After all, good fences make good neighbors, etc.; but, to reconcile conflicting claims, why not perform a Solomon-like division of what is in dispute.

The proponents of division mostly argue practicality: since the two communities cannot live together, they should separate. In real life, however, cutting a city in half is easier said than done, and having two sovereigns govern different parts may prove not only an impossible task, but also a dangerous one, leading to total chaos.

When our distinguished poet Haim Gouri agonizes over a possible threat to Israel’s very survival as a Jewish state posed by the “collapse” of our “ethos of standing up firm”, we should listen to his ruminations with alarm; for their insights, of course, but also because they reveal a continued part-blindness of the generation that created his “collapsed world”, that discourages a process of healing.

Adaptation to gentile rule enabled Jews to preserve their nationhood without a land for a long while. But with the advent of populist democracies, politically powerless Jews became so tempting a target that disaster was inevitable. Although Zionism “tried to develop a ‘new Jew’,”Harvard Prof. Ruth Weiss argued last week (in the second annual Bernstein Memorial Lecture), there were still left in Israel vestiges of the ‘old Jew’ ” who was habitually politically accommodating ”. It prevents Israel, she believes, from trying “to convince its neighbors and the world that it expects their accommodation to the needs of the Jews.”

Like successive marriages, the blind faith of Israelis that “clean, new” leadership will set all wrongs right represents the triumph of hope over experience. Again and again, our statist distributive system corrupts politics and brings out the worst, even in the best. Rampant statism has ground the Soviet empire to dust, and caused us disaster after disaster. Yet, after each catastrophe, we search amidst the rubble for a new white hope, clinging to the illusion that given the “right” leadership, Israel can revive itself without paying the painful cost of true reform.