A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
A recent conference at the Tel Aviv University School of Government, that was supposed to hold an academic discussion on the desired distribution of the income to be derived from the findings of gas off our shore, was an example of how politics are taking over our universities. Sponsored by the notoriously “post-Zionist” and anti-capitalist New Israel Fund, and three organizations affiliated by it, the “conference” espoused a clear political agenda, whose conclusions where emblazoned on huge posters at the entrance. The “debate” it featured was a sham, giving voice mostly to those who supported its foregone conclusions and limiting the few opposing voices to three minutes each.
At the root of most ills, academic, organizational and budgetary inflicting our universities is their increasing politicization.
Large chunks of the social sciences and humanity departments are dominated by tenured professors who, under the guise of academic learning and freedom, promote a post modernist nihilism (since all knowledge is just someone’s domineering “narrative”, everything goes) and obsess about establishing a Palestinian State. As if the Jewish state’s legitimacy depended on it, no matter how irredentist and dictatorial it will be, and how oppressive it already is to its own people. Somehow, our academicians believe that supporting such a jingoistic and criminal entity can atone for Israel’s putative colonialism even if the poor Palestinians will have to live in another Arab “democracy”.
Our “social minded” liberals also uphold a neo-Marxist ideology, hostile to free markets and to growth. They have brainwashed generations of students (no opposing views get a hearing in class) indoctrinating them with an ideology that fifty years ago, when the horrors of Communism were not famous yet, they absorbed as innocent students.
Such regressive views have done enormous damage to the Israeli economy and to its society. A damaging ethos of “Welfarism” and distributive politics has come to dominate not only the academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites. It believes that profit derives from exploitation, and that every deal, especially commercial, is a zero sum game, the winner exploiting a loser. It promotes the old Marxist “class struggle” conundrum and defends monopolistic unions as necessary to protect workers.
This destructive view of economic activity has become a self fulfilling prophecy. Perhaps it is why it is often difficult to do business with Israelis. An adversarial attitude to labor relations and the imposition of Histadrut generated “progressive” labor laws have so politicized the workplace that the capable Israeli worker is unable to produce more than two thirds of what an American worker produces. Low productivity translates naturally into low wages.
Such negative attitudes toward enterprise are the cause the Israeli economy, endowed with enormous potential, the best human capital in the world, and hundreds of billions invested from foreign sources, has performed until the recent pro-markets reforms, like a third world economy. The continued domination by a few tycoons and their monopolies and oligopolies is a continuing cause why the Israeli economy cannot fulfill its great potential.
Our academicians seem oblivious to all this and to the fact that economic concentration created by government domination of the economy constrains competition and damages efficiency. Lack of competition enables the tycoons to inflate prices and lack of efficiency helps them justify the low wages they pay. High prices and low wages dictated by monopolies – and not exploitation by the free market system, as these academicians claim – is responsible for the fact that most Israelis, especially the lower paid strata – are unable to make ends meet (altogether only dogmatic Marxists can imagine that the Israel economy, still replete with government intervention and with government sanctioned monopolies and entry barriers is a capitalist “Thatcherite”, no less, economy!).
Our academicians have therefore stood aloof from the effort to break our economy’s excessive concentration. Many of their pro-welfare organization get substantial contributions from our tycoons, helping legitimize them.
To protect, ostensibly, the weakened strata, that welfare keeps weak and dependent (since the high taxes required to maintain its proliferating bureaucracies and wasteful practices chock growth and spread poverty), our academicians have developed a complete theology of “rights” that the government (namely the tax payer) must translate into entitlements. They are blind to the fact that, generally, governments’ interventions in the economy help mostly the politically privileged, but hurt the rest by curbing growth. List all the “underdeveloped” areas in Israel, including the Negev the Galilee and Jerusalem, and you get a list of places the government spent billions “to help”. The universal failure of Communist and Socialist regimes and the repeated bankruptcy of welfare systems are in great part due to the fact that they must be run by governments.
The academicians’ advocacy of radical welfarism also makes a mockery of Zionism which was originally meant to help Jews become productive, self-sufficient people. Instead welfarism made Israelis dependent on a corrupt and corrupting political system that is radicalizing politics by forcing them to fight for government favors. But Marxism acts as blinders. Our academicians cannot understand that a welfare state means big government, and big government is inevitably wasteful and corrupt.
Need we still prove why the politicization of the academy is ruining in addition the few last nature preserves where one can hold in Israel an open pluralistic discussion? Those in doubt should please explain how Israeli elites came to resemble “a one note choir” as Prof. Amnon Rubinstein once put it.
Log in or Register
Israel’s progress undermined
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
Filed under:
fundamentals • labor market • public policy • education • welfare
At the root of most ills, academic, organizational and budgetary inflicting our universities is their increasing politicization.
Large chunks of the social sciences and humanity departments are dominated by tenured professors who, under the guise of academic learning and freedom, promote a post modernist nihilism (since all knowledge is just someone’s domineering “narrative”, everything goes) and obsess about establishing a Palestinian State. As if the Jewish state’s legitimacy depended on it, no matter how irredentist and dictatorial it will be, and how oppressive it already is to its own people. Somehow, our academicians believe that supporting such a jingoistic and criminal entity can atone for Israel’s putative colonialism even if the poor Palestinians will have to live in another Arab “democracy”.
Our “social minded” liberals also uphold a neo-Marxist ideology, hostile to free markets and to growth. They have brainwashed generations of students (no opposing views get a hearing in class) indoctrinating them with an ideology that fifty years ago, when the horrors of Communism were not famous yet, they absorbed as innocent students.
Such regressive views have done enormous damage to the Israeli economy and to its society. A damaging ethos of “Welfarism” and distributive politics has come to dominate not only the academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites. It believes that profit derives from exploitation, and that every deal, especially commercial, is a zero sum game, the winner exploiting a loser. It promotes the old Marxist “class struggle” conundrum and defends monopolistic unions as necessary to protect workers.
This destructive view of economic activity has become a self fulfilling prophecy. Perhaps it is why it is often difficult to do business with Israelis. An adversarial attitude to labor relations and the imposition of Histadrut generated “progressive” labor laws have so politicized the workplace that the capable Israeli worker is unable to produce more than two thirds of what an American worker produces. Low productivity translates naturally into low wages.
Such negative attitudes toward enterprise are the cause the Israeli economy, endowed with enormous potential, the best human capital in the world, and hundreds of billions invested from foreign sources, has performed until the recent pro-markets reforms, like a third world economy. The continued domination by a few tycoons and their monopolies and oligopolies is a continuing cause why the Israeli economy cannot fulfill its great potential.
Our academicians seem oblivious to all this and to the fact that economic concentration created by government domination of the economy constrains competition and damages efficiency. Lack of competition enables the tycoons to inflate prices and lack of efficiency helps them justify the low wages they pay. High prices and low wages dictated by monopolies – and not exploitation by the free market system, as these academicians claim – is responsible for the fact that most Israelis, especially the lower paid strata – are unable to make ends meet (altogether only dogmatic Marxists can imagine that the Israel economy, still replete with government intervention and with government sanctioned monopolies and entry barriers is a capitalist “Thatcherite”, no less, economy!).
Our academicians have therefore stood aloof from the effort to break our economy’s excessive concentration. Many of their pro-welfare organization get substantial contributions from our tycoons, helping legitimize them.
To protect, ostensibly, the weakened strata, that welfare keeps weak and dependent (since the high taxes required to maintain its proliferating bureaucracies and wasteful practices chock growth and spread poverty), our academicians have developed a complete theology of “rights” that the government (namely the tax payer) must translate into entitlements. They are blind to the fact that, generally, governments’ interventions in the economy help mostly the politically privileged, but hurt the rest by curbing growth. List all the “underdeveloped” areas in Israel, including the Negev the Galilee and Jerusalem, and you get a list of places the government spent billions “to help”. The universal failure of Communist and Socialist regimes and the repeated bankruptcy of welfare systems are in great part due to the fact that they must be run by governments.
The academicians’ advocacy of radical welfarism also makes a mockery of Zionism which was originally meant to help Jews become productive, self-sufficient people. Instead welfarism made Israelis dependent on a corrupt and corrupting political system that is radicalizing politics by forcing them to fight for government favors. But Marxism acts as blinders. Our academicians cannot understand that a welfare state means big government, and big government is inevitably wasteful and corrupt.
Need we still prove why the politicization of the academy is ruining in addition the few last nature preserves where one can hold in Israel an open pluralistic discussion? Those in doubt should please explain how Israeli elites came to resemble “a one note choir” as Prof. Amnon Rubinstein once put it.
More recent commentary
The New Republic
19 May ’11
Economic Miracle
A Middle East peace strategy that could actually work.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Mar ’11
The government-tycoons-media triangle
Israel needs to slash its state budget by as much as possible if it wants a chance at fighting waste and corruption.
The Jerusalem Post
9 Mar ’11
Welfare and rebellion: The economic factor in the Arab uprisings
Too little attention has been paid to how Egypt’s socialist past and welfare-state present shaped the current rebellion.
The Jerusalem Post
7 Feb ’11
Is all quiet on the economic front?
The Herzliya Conference has become an important international event, but one central issue is absent: Israel’s debilitating economic concentration.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’11
Teaching an elephant to dance
It’s highly unlikely that government can ever learn to make long-term plans and execute them efficiently.
The Jerusalem Post
23 Dec ’10
Hellenization and Enlightenment: Post-Hanukka ruminations
How can one dare compare narrow-minded religion with the all-embracing faith of universality and equality that is socialism?
The Jerusalem Post
1 Dec ’10
Would Milton Friedman have approved?
Many of the social and economic troubles we are experiencing are due to the public’s lack of understanding of the need for economic literacy.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’10
Perverting public discourse
The PM’s courageous decision to tackle economic concentration was misrepresented by several of our media publications—owned of course by tycoons.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Oct ’10
Breaking Israel’s monopolies
Economic concentration hurts the country’s viability and the chances for peace.
The Jerusalem Post
4 Oct ’10
Israel’s progress undermined
A damaging ethos of ‘welfarism’ and distributive politics has come to dominate not only academia but our cultural, military and even our business elites.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Aug ’10
Unable to decide
The reformers must know the importance of the reform’s success both for Israel and for their careers, and what damage they will incur if it fails.
The Jerusalem Post
13 Jul ’10
Elana Kagan, terrorism and the law
Kagan’s admiration for Justice Aharon Barak’s philosophy may have revealed her own predilection for radical judicial activism.
The Jerusalem Post
30 May ’10
Yes, break them up
We must dismantle the oligarch-owned monopolies that impoverish the Israeli consumer and choke our economy.
The Wall Street Journal
18 May ’10
Land of silicon and money
The OECD’s invitation to Israel is a “seal of approval” but the country still needs more reforms.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Feb ’10
The surprise of it all
The world’s astonishment at Israel’s response to the Haiti disaster is insulting. What we saw there was Israel’s true face.
The Jerusalem Post
10 Jan ’10
Hi-tech prospects and pitfalls
Individual initiative and freedom are essential for creativity—in hi-tech as in all other spheres.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Oct ’09
A woman who knew her worth
As far as Rose Friedman was concerned, public kudos did not matter that much. She persisted in being a rose, no matter what.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Sep ’09
Movies in Nablus, dramas in Bethlehem
Lasting peace must grow from the bottom up, from an “economic peace process” that proves what advantages peace has to offer on a daily basis. It cannot come from signing peace agreements with radical and corrupt entities propped up by corrupting Western handouts.
The Jerusalem Post
15 Aug ’09
Israel’s ‘scrambled’ economic system
A courageous recent film has exposes the strong connection between Israeli oligarchs and bureaucrats. Unfortunately however the film’s simplistic pseudo-Marxist treatment is more misleading than revealing.
The Jerusalem Post
24 May ’09
The economy: look to the future
Netanyahu paid heavily to pass a budget in time; his “partners”’ bargaining tactics, bordering on blackmail, reflect poorly on our politics.
The Jerusalem Post
4 May ’09
Reform: prospects and pitfalls
Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent economic plan has great promise but faces obstacles—such as the media and the Histadrut—that may undermine its success.
The Jerusalem Post
11 Apr ’09
Big government? Yes, but there’s a reason
Is Binyamin Netanyahu’s government too big? Yes. So why would Netanyahu create such an unwieldy beast?
The Jerusalem Post
30 Mar ’09
To bail or not to bail
Should the government bail out those of our tycoons who cannot redeem NIS 100 billion worth of bonds?
The Wall Street Journal
12 Mar ’09
Mideast peace can start with economic growth
Billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians has resulted in war not peace. There’s a better way.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Feb ’09
Warning cries from Herzliya
The government is dysfunctional. The question is why—and how to mend it.
The Jerusalem Post
2 Feb ’09
A lesser economic evil
All government deficit spending is bad. But sometimes deficits are unavoidable. And some deficits are better then others.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Dec ’08
Spinners and cheaters
Why not exploit the crisis to destroy what little freedom Netanyahu’s reforms brought to the economy? Why care if the country will lose its only hope of deliverance from the economic retardation caused by our statist heritage?
The Jerusalem Post
3 Dec ’08
Precipitating the next collapse
Focusing on a putative pension crisis distracts our attention from the real serious crisis that a worldwide recession is bound to create here.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Oct ’08
The panic-mongers’ one-note chorus
The country, the pundits conclude, must return to the good old days of “social democracy.”
The Jerusalem Post
15 Jul ’08
The banks are bamboozling us again
In the name of stability the comptroller has ignored many of the banks’ offenses.
The Jerusalem Post
29 Apr ’08
An Irish-style banana republic
It must be either naiveté or cynicism that allows “Israel 2028” to recommend a reform that will make government a larger and a more efficient instrument for economic growth.
The New York Sun
29 Apr ’08
Israel still doesn’t get economy
Israel’s elites—especially the chattering classes in the press and the academy—are hostile to capitalism because our universities’ social sciences and liberal arts departments are dominated by post-modernist and neo-Marxist professors.
Ideas matter. Hostility to capitalism exacts a great price from the Israeli economy and from its hapless workers.
inFocus
2 Apr ’08
US charity to Israel reconsidered
Jewish institutional efforts must now undergo a period of reform and greater accountability. Some charitable efforts should be privatized. Individuals or groups of donors must take personal responsibility for specific projects, to ensure that funds are dispensed in a responsible and cost effective manner.
The Wall Street Journal
8 Mar ’08
Israel’s no-win strategy
Israeli politicians are preoccupied with political machinations designed to buy support from powerful interest groups by distributing government largesse. This causes not only the factionalization of politics and growing corruption, but consumes time and energy that leadership should use to address life and death issues.
The Jerusalem Post
20 Feb ’08
Dangerous infatuation
Government can no more control powerful economic forces than it can the rise and fall of tides. To effectively fulfill its nightwatchman role—to protect us from internal and external violence and to enforce contracts—government must be kept limited.
The Jerusalem Post
22 Jan ’08
What’s ‘public’ about their broadcasting?
Our “public channel,” funded by a compulsive tax, does not need to be pluralistic or even-handed.
Like other public institutions that lack well-defined ownership, Channel 1 has consequently been taken over by bureaucrats and by undemocratic workers’ unions.
The Jerusalem Post
21 Nov ’07
A year without Milton Friedman
This man did more good for humanity than any other.
The Jerusalem Post
17 Oct ’07
Getting beyond the teachers’ strike
As long as education remains a government monopoly, it is bound to function like all other government monopolies, where union bosses fill the vacuum that lack of defined ownership creates, and monopoly power allows them to blackmail the public.
The Jerusalem Post
19 Sep ’07
A healthy dose of skepticism
In the wake of the Second Lebanon War, there is hope that the phenomenal performance of the economy will finally make Israelis realize the crucial role it plays in their lives.
The Jerusalem Post
14 Aug ’07
How to grow Israeli hi-tech
At the recent Merage Foundation conference to help Israel’s hi-tech sector grow, calls were heard for more government “direction”. This despite sixty years of massive government intervention and “development efforts” that have led mostly to massive failures and waste.